Law:

Section:

Section 24 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 - [Corresponding to Section 72 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922] - Loss - Set off and carry forward of business loss CASE REVIEW Principles explained by Rowlatt J., in Butler v. The Mortgage Company of Egypt Ltd. [1928] 13 T.C. 803 followed and relied upon. General Family Pension Fund v. CIT I.L.R. 1946 2 Cal. 259/14 ITR 488 distinguished. JUDGMENT Chakravartti, CJ.-Three questions have been referred in this case by the Calcutta Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal for the decision of this Court. They arise out of the following facts:- The assessee, the United Commercial Bank Limited, is a banking company, said to be in a large way of business. It receives an interest income from its investments in securities, makes profit from its banking business and receives a dividend income from certain shares it holds. For the assessment year 1945-46, its net assessable income was determined at Rs. 14,95,826 and that figure was arrived at by the usual method of computing the income derived from three different sources separately, setting off the loss under one head against the profit under another and then adding together the balance left under the different heads. Thus the income from interest on securities was computed under Section 8 of the Act and determined at Rs. 23,62,815. The profits or gains of business were computed under Section 10 and a loss of Rs. 8,86,972 was found. A small income from other sources, including some dividend income, was computed under Section 12. The loss under the business income was then set off against the income of interest on securities under Section 24(1) of the Act and after making some further adjustments, the net assessable income was determined at Rs. 14,95,826 as I stated a few moments ago. The assessee had no complaint to make about the amount at which the assessable income had been determined, but it objected to the method employed in arriving at that amount. The objection was that the interest on securities ought not to have been separately assessed under Section 8, but the income should have been taken to be a part of the business income and the whole of the profits or gains…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492