| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 2375 2020 SLD 2375 2020 YLR 2476 |
Islamabad High Court
Jail Appeals Nos. 101, 102 and Murder Reference No. 5 of 2017, decided on 04th May, 2020, Date of hearing: 15th April, 2020.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Muhammad Aslam Ch., Jan Muhammad Khan, Akseer Ahmed Abbasi, Ms. Moona Nazir and Ms. Rakhshanda Azhar for Appellants. Syed Zia Hussain Kazmi for the Complainant.
Jail Appeals Nos. 101, 102 and Murder Reference No. 5 of 2017, decided on 04th May, 2020, Date of hearing: 15th April, 2020.
MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB, JUSTICE
Muhammad Aslam Ch., Jan Muhammad Khan, Akseer Ahmed Abbasi, Ms. Moona Nazir and Ms. Rakhshanda Azhar for Appellants. Syed Zia Hussain Kazmi for the Complainant.
MUHAMMAD RASHID AND ANOTHER
VS
THE STATE
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b)
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 164,342
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.302(b)---Qatl-i-Amd--- Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Nature of injuries---Proof---Deceased was shot from a close distance and the same was not supported by medical evidence---Un-scaled or scaled plan did not refer to any brick having been removed from wall---Evidence did not explain existence of seven empties because autopsy report confirmed three entry wounds---Draftsman did not observe any mark of gun shot on walls of small uninhabited room---Investigating officer also did not see signs of any brick removed from the wall---Investigating officer did not explain as to how the complainant received information about involvement of accused persons---Draftsman did not show any source of light---Police received information that one dead body was lying in an uninhabited room i.e. the crime scene---No explanation was available on record as to how and by whom the dead body was discovered lying at the crime scene---Motive was not proved by prosecution and reference of witnesses to the relationship between accused persons could not be relied upon---High Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded to accused by extending him benefit of doubt and acquitted him of the charge---Appeal was allowed in circumstances. Muhammad Nadeem alias Deemi v. The State 2011 SCMR 872; Shehzado v. The State PLD 2005 SC 477; Nasir Mehmood and another v. State 2015 SCMR 423, Majeed v. The State 2010 SCMR 55; Hassan Askari v. The State 2011 PCr.LJ 778; Dr Aziza and others v. Muhammad Sarwar 1997 MLD 2013; Nazeer alias Wazeer v. The State PLD 2007 SC 202; Hashim Qasim and another v. The State 2017 SCMR 986; Azeem Khan and another v. Mujahid Khan and others 2016 SCMR 274; Dadullah and another v. The State 2015 SCMR 856; Allah Nawaz v. The State 2009 SCMR 736; Manjeet Singh v. The State PLD 2006 SC 30 and Muhamamd Shafi v. Muhammad Raza and another 2008 SCMR 329 ref. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 164 342---Statement of accused---Scope---Voluntary and true statement recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. requires no corroboration and may be sufficient for handing down a conviction--Court as a rule of precaution seek corroboration…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492