| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 79 2020 SLD 79 2020 PLD 1 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Constitutional Petition No. 39 of 2019, decision Dated:28-11-2019. Dates of hearing: 26th, 27th and 28th November,2019. (In the matter of the Tenure and Extension of theChief of the Army Staff).
MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: person.
Respondent(s) by:Anwar Mansoor Khan, Attorney-General for Pakistan with Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, Addl. Attorney-General Amir-ur-Rehman, Addl. Attorney-General Ch. Ishtiaq Ahmed, Addl. Attorney-General.Mian Asghar Ali, Dy. Attorne
Constitutional Petition No. 39 of 2019, decision Dated:28-11-2019. Dates of hearing: 26th, 27th and 28th November,2019. (In the matter of the Tenure and Extension of theChief of the Army Staff).
MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: person.
Respondent(s) by:Anwar Mansoor Khan, Attorney-General for Pakistan with Sajid Ilyas Bhatti, Addl. Attorney-General Amir-ur-Rehman, Addl. Attorney-General Ch. Ishtiaq Ahmed, Addl. Attorney-General.Mian Asghar Ali, Dy. Attorne
JURISTS FOUNDATION THROUGH CHAIRMANVSFEDERAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND OTHERS
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 9,19A,27,184(3),199,240,243,243(3)(4)(b) ,245
Law: Army Regulations Rules, 1998
Section: 19,125,255,262A
Law: Rules of Business (Federal), 1973
Section: R.19
Law: Pakistan Army Act, 1952
Section: 8(2),18,176A
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 184(3)---Public interest litigation before the Supreme Court---Withdrawal of petition with permission of Court---Scope and principles---Public interest litigation could only be withdrawn with the permission of the Court, because it did not raise a personal issue limited to the petitioner; it was not a dominis litis (the person to whom a suit belongs) that would give a right to the petitioner to withdraw it as a matter of choice---In granting the permission (to withdraw) the Court would be guided by considerations of public interest and would also ensure that it did not result in the abuse of the process of law---Courts must guard against possibilities of such litigants settling the matters out of Court to their advantage and then seeking withdrawal of the case---Sometimes withdrawal of a public interest litigation, for oblique ends, could be used to the detriment of the public interest agitated therein---Court had to be cautious not to fall prey to such oblique motives---Proceedings in public interest litigation were inquisitorial in nature and, therefore, the request for withdrawal of such litigation must always be weighed in the light of the question of public importance raised in it---Petitioner initiating public interest litigation was, therefore, not entitled to withdraw the petition at his sweet will---Court, however, may permit withdrawal of such litigation on considering the nature of the matter agitated therein and ensuring that it did not involve abuse of the process of law. AIR 1997 SC 272; PLD 2017 Lah. 588; PLD 2014 Bal. 1 and AIR 1988 SC 2211 ref. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 9, 19A, 27, 243(4)(b) & 245---Pakistan Army Act (XXXIX of 1952), S.8(2)---Army Regulations (Rules), 1998, Regln. 19---Constitutional petition before the Supreme Court relating to the tenure and extension of the Chief of the Army Staff---Maintainability---Armed Forces were to defend the country against external aggression and threat of war, under the Constitution---Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) was an officer commanding the Army and was responsible for the command, discipline, training, administration, organization and…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492