| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1710 2018 SLD 1710 2018 CLC 1257 |
Peshawar High Court
W.Ps. Nos. 334-P and 356-A of 2017, decided & hearing on 25-07-2017.
SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE, SYED ARSHAD ALI, JUSTICE
Abdul Latif Afridi for Petitioners. Raja Muhammad Zubair, A.A.G. for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. Syed Hameed Hussain Shah, Assistant A.G. for
Respondent No. 5. Junaid Anwar Khan for
Respondents Nos. 6 to 13.
W.Ps. Nos. 334-P and 356-A of 2017, decided & hearing on 25-07-2017.
SYED MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE SHAH, JUSTICE, SYED ARSHAD ALI, JUSTICE
Abdul Latif Afridi for Petitioners. Raja Muhammad Zubair, A.A.G. for
Respondents Nos. 1 to 4. Syed Hameed Hussain Shah, Assistant A.G. for
Respondent No. 5. Junaid Anwar Khan for
Respondents Nos. 6 to 13.
NOOR MUHAMMAD ADVOCATE THROUGH SPECIAL ATTORNEY
VS
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT ELECTION AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, CIVIL SECRETARIAL PESHAWAR AND 12 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Local Government Act (XXVIII of 2013)--- ----Ss. 84 & 55---District Council (Procedure and Conduct of Business and Meetings) Byelaws, 2015, Clause 9---No-confidence motion against Nazim and Naib Nazim of District Council---Procedure---Local Government Commission, functions of---No confidence motion moved against Nazim and Naib Nazim succeeded wherein Presiding Officer also cast his vote---Contention of petitioners was that Presiding Officer had no authority to cast his vote---Validity---Two-third majority of the total number of members of local council electing Nazim and Naib Nazim were required for success of no confidence motion against them---Presiding Officer being a member of local council could cast his vote in no-confidence motion---Proceedings of no-confidence motion could not be called in question before Local Government Commission nor it had any mandate to reject or set aside the outcome of said motion---District Council was an independent body, however, its functions and affairs were subject to direction of the Chief Minister---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Interpretation of statutes--- ----Presumption is that legislature choose its words carefully, therefore, if a word or phrase added somewhere, such addition was not to be deemed redundant; conversely, if a word or phrase had been left out somewhere, such omission was not to be deemed inconsequential. On the Interpretation of Statutes by Maxwell 11th edition at page 311; Muhammad Ismail v. The State PLD 1969 SC 241 and Zahid Iqbal v. Hafiz Muhammad Adnan and others 2016 SCMR 430 rel. (c) Words and Phrases--- ----'Cast of vote'---Meaning---Cast of vote means. A deciding vote cast by the chair of deliberative assembly when the votes are tied. Black's Law Dictionary rel. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: SYED ARSHAD ALI, J.--- Through this single judgment we intend to dispose of Writ Petitions No.356-A/2017 and No.730-A/2017 as in the above writ petitions a common question of law is involved. In Writ Petition No.356-A/2017, the petitioner Noor Muhammad seeks constitutional jurisdiction of this Court praying that; "It is therefore prayed that impugned…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492