| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 2908 2019 SLD 2908 2019 PCRLJ 1743 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 78-J of 2014 and Murder Reference No. 3of 2013, decision & hearing Dated: 13-11-2018.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Muddasar Altaf Qureshi and Mian Babar Saleem
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ali Shahab, District Prosecutor-General with Aurangzeb, ASI
Criminal Appeal No. 78-J of 2014 and Murder Reference No. 3of 2013, decision & hearing Dated: 13-11-2018.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Muddasar Altaf Qureshi and Mian Babar Saleem
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ali Shahab, District Prosecutor-General with Aurangzeb, ASI
SHAH BEHRAM AND ANOTHERVSTHE STATE AND OTHERS
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 148,149,302,302(b)
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 103
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Chance witness---Non-examination of private witnesses---Non-production of blood-stained clothes of witnesses---Effect---Prosecution case against accused persons was that they killed the deceased persons by firing---Complainant in his oral statement had stated that he along with others boarded a bus proceeding to place 'S', however, while appearing before Trial Court he and other witness stated that they were going to see the deceased---Said statement was in direct contrast to the sequence mentioned in the FIR---Both witnesses of the occurrence were chance witnesses---Complainant and the eye-witness stated that one of the deceased was fired at inside the bus and the deceased after receiving the fire shot fell on the seat---Contrary to the above, complainant and investigating officer stated that police took into possession blood-stained earth underneath the dead body of the deceased---Investigating officer stated that he did not collect the blood of the deceased from inside the bus---Neither the driver nor the conductor of the said bus was examined during the investigation---No one other than the related witnesses, who were riding the bus at the relevant time, were examined during investigation or trial of the case---Complainant admitted during cross-examination that the clothes of witnesses were stained with blood, however, said clothes were not taken into possession by the investigating officer---Appeal was accepted and conviction and sentences awarded by Trial Court were set aside---Murder reference was answered in the negative. Nadeem alias Nanha alias Billa Sher v. The State 2010 SCMR 949 rel. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Medical and ocular evidence---Contradiction---Scope---Complainant and witness claimed that deceased was fired at when the accused person boarded the bus---Held; had such being the position blackening would have been observed at the time of post-mortem on the body of deceased---Doctor did not observe any blackening during post-mortem--- Appeal was allowed, in circumstances. Barkat Ali v. Muhammad Asif…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492