| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 2335 2019 SLD 2335 2019 PLJ 322 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 536 of 2015, decision Dated: 12.04.2018. Hearing Dated: 08.03.2018 (Against judgment Dated 04.2.2015 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar passed in Writ Petition No. 1012 of 2014)
EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR, JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. M.Shoaib Shaheen, ASC
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Khalid Khan, ASC Nos.1-5.
Civil Petition No. 536 of 2015, decision Dated: 12.04.2018. Hearing Dated: 08.03.2018 (Against judgment Dated 04.2.2015 of the Peshawar High Court, Peshawar passed in Writ Petition No. 1012 of 2014)
EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR, JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. M.Shoaib Shaheen, ASC
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Khalid Khan, ASC Nos.1-5.
DR. IKRAMULLAH KHAN
VS
KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, PESHAWAR AND OTHERS
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 212(3)
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 212(3)--Advertisement for post of associate professor--Requirement of post--Petitioner was not selected--Requisite experience--Write petition--Dismissed--Dissertation of petitioner--Constitution of Committee--Submission of report--Dissertations/thesis of all three of them, pertain to field of Weed Science--Through their "general remarks" as incorporated in said minutes, Professors seem to have conveyed that normally in relation to foreign degrees conferring a doctorate on a candidate it is not text of degree, but research conducted by candidates (which certainly is reflected through their dissertations) which is determinative of specific area or specialization of in a particular subject doctorate has been conferred--Subject, scope and focus of respondents in their doctorate program was therefore evidently and clearly relating to management of weeds which falls within ambit of Weed Science--It may also be beneficial to note here that Weed Science is discipline concerned with plants that may be considered weeds, their effects on human activities and their management--It is study of vegetation in agriculture, aquatics and horticulture--Petitioner's objection that said two respondents did not possess requisite experience, also is clearly untenable, baseless and frivolous, as said respondents have since their appointment on 01.2.2003 and 16.9.2002, been teaching Weed Science in respondent University--Since credential and academic qualifications of respondents were evaluated by three subject specialist from outside Respondents' university, and same were re-evaluated by a high profile committee and were after going through said process, granted marks higher than those granted to petitioner, and their re-evaluation by Selection Board was approbated by Syndicate of University--Neither High Court, nor this Court can, in facts and circumstances of case, substitute such evaluation, opinion and recommendation in favour of respondents--Petition was dismissed. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MAQBOOL BAQAR, J.- The grievance of the petitioner is that though he has achieved his Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree, in "Weed Sciences", and also…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492