| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 1104 2020 SLD 1104 2020 PCRLJ 776 |
Lahore High Court
Cr. Misc. No. 58888-B of 2019, decided on 31st October, 2019.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, JUSTICE
Nawab Ali Mayo for Petitioner. Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, DPG with Iftikhar, SI for the State. Muhammad Javaid Kasuri for the Complainant.
Cr. Misc. No. 58888-B of 2019, decided on 31st October, 2019.
SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR, JUSTICE
Nawab Ali Mayo for Petitioner. Muhammad Ahmed Saeed, DPG with Iftikhar, SI for the State. Muhammad Javaid Kasuri for the Complainant.
ASAD ALI
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHER
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302,34
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 38
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302 & 34---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 38---Qatl-i-amd, common intention---Bail, grant of---Confession to police officer not to be proved---Delayed supplementary statement--- Implication of accused on the statement of co-accused---Extra judicial confession---Further inquiry---Completion of investigation---Scope---Accused along with others was alleged to have committed murder---Accused was not nominated in the FIR rather implicated on the basis of extra judicial confession of co-accused---Complainant had made supplementary statement on the basis of extra judicial confession of co-accused after a delay of eight months of the alleged incident---Statements of witnesses of extra judicial confession did not contain any manner of commission of offence---Nothing was available on record to show as to who had strangulated the deceased---Only a rassi was recovered from the possession of accused, which was not sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis---Question of vicarious liability had to be determined at the time of trial---Except the statement of co-accused under S. 161, Cr.P.C., no evidence was collected by the Investigating Agency, which made the case of accused that of further inquiry under S. 497(2), Cr.P.C.---Statement of co-accused recorded by police during investigation was inadmissible in evidence---Investigation of the case was complete---Accused was not required by the police for further investigation---Accused was behind the bars since his arrest without any progress in the trial---Fair and speedy trial was one of the fundamental rights of accused---No moral or legal compulsion existed to keep the accused behind the bars for an indefinite period, which amounted to punishment without trial---Petition for grant of bail was accepted, in circumstances. Khan Sardar and another v. The State and another 2009 YLR 1076 ref. The State through Deputy Director Anti-Narcotic Force, Karachi v. Syed Abdul Qayum 2001 SCMR 14 fol. Raja Muhammad Younas v. The State 2013 SCMR 669 rel. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497--- Bail--- Tentative…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492