| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1744 2018 SLD 1744 2018 PTD 1522 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
S.T.As. Nos. 34/KB and 66/KB of 2013, decision Dated: 08-12-2016. Hearing Date : 21-10-2016.2
AMBREEN ASLAM, JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMED SAEED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Arshad Mehmood, F.C.A. for Appellant (in S.T.A. No.34/KB of 2013). Pervez Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent (in S.T.A. No.34/KB of 2013). Pervez Ahmad, D.R. for Appellant (in S.T.A. No.66/KB of 2013). Arshad Mehmood, F.C.A. for
Respondent (in S.T.A. No.66/KB
S.T.As. Nos. 34/KB and 66/KB of 2013, decision Dated: 08-12-2016. Hearing Date : 21-10-2016.2
AMBREEN ASLAM, JUDICIAL MEMBER AHMED SAEED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Arshad Mehmood, F.C.A. for Appellant (in S.T.A. No.34/KB of 2013). Pervez Ahmad, D.R. for
Respondent (in S.T.A. No.34/KB of 2013). Pervez Ahmad, D.R. for Appellant (in S.T.A. No.66/KB of 2013). Arshad Mehmood, F.C.A. for
Respondent (in S.T.A. No.66/KB
M/S. SUI SOUTHERN GAS COMPANY LTD., KARACHI
VS
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, Zone-III, KARACHI
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 3,4,7,8,11,13,33,34,34A,36
(a) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 3, 7, 11 & 36---Fixed assets---Non-payment of sales tax on disposal of fixed assets---Appellant company, contended that the department's assertion regarding non-charging of sales tax on disposal of fixed assets was contrary to the facts, and the company had properly charged and deposited the sales tax---Appellant company, in support of said contention, produced copies of some sales tax invoices---Plea of Departmental Representative was that appellant could not produce any convincing evidence in support of its contention---Issue involved in the case was of factual nature, which could be resolved after reconciliation of facts and examining the documents submitted by the appellant---Matter was remanded to the department for detailed verification of sales tax as claimed to have been paid by the appellant. (b) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 4 & 36---S.R.O. No.1164(I)/2007, dated 30-11-2007---Non-charging of sales tax on transportation charges---Sales tax was chargeable on value of supply and not on the value of services, which was a domain of the Provinces---If the transportation charges were added as a value of supply in the value of condensate, which was chargeable at the rate of zero percent, resultant sales tax would remain zero---Demand created by the department as upheld by appellate authority below, were ordered to be deleted by the Tribunal. (c) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 3, 7, 11, 13 & 36---Charge of sales tax on service connection of gas---Scope---Activity of "providing gas connection" and "supplying of gas" were separate processes "Service charges" was a medium for supply of gas and it could not be termed as value of supply of gas---Said service charges represented activity for establishing the connection like fixation of pipeline etc., prior to actual supply of gas---Main revenue was generated from sales, which represented supply of gas to consumer---Sales tax was leviable on amount of sale---Appellant had rightly submitted that services, were not taxable---Demand raised by department was ordered to be deleted by the Tribunal. (d) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)--- ----Ss. 3, 7 &…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492