| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1975 SLG 20 1975 SLD 20 (1976) 34 TAX 54 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 1380 of 1971, decided of 6-4-1976. dates of hearing: 15-1-1976, 16-1-1976, 19-20-1-1976, 23-2-1976 and 1- 3-1976
KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN AND K.M.A. SAMADANI, JJ
Haji Sh. Ghias Mohammad, Mumtaz Hussain, Mohammad Amin Butt and Javed Hashmi, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Sh. Abdul Haq, M. Ilyas Khan, Advocates and Raja Mohammad Anwar, Deputy Attorney-General, with K.M. Virk, Advocate, for the
Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1380 of 1971, decided of 6-4-1976. dates of hearing: 15-1-1976, 16-1-1976, 19-20-1-1976, 23-2-1976 and 1- 3-1976
KARAM ELAHEE CHAUHAN AND K.M.A. SAMADANI, JJ
Haji Sh. Ghias Mohammad, Mumtaz Hussain, Mohammad Amin Butt and Javed Hashmi, Advocates, for the Petitioner. Sh. Abdul Haq, M. Ilyas Khan, Advocates and Raja Mohammad Anwar, Deputy Attorney-General, with K.M. Virk, Advocate, for the
Respondents
CROWN BUS SERVICE LTD., LAHORE
VS
CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS
Law: Government of India Act, 1935
Section: 17,17(1)
[Government of India Act, 1935].......Section 17(1)-Provisions of Section 17(1) requiring all executive actions to be done in the name of Governor General-Whether merely directory in nature -Held yes-Non-observance of the Provisions-Whether affects the acts of the Central Government even otherwise performed by competent authority-Held no-Notification No. 3, dated 29-8-1947 not issued in the name of Governor-General-Whether invalid and ineffective--Held no. Central Beard of Revenue Act, 1924 (IV of 1924)--Section 2- Constitution of Central Board of Revenue and appointment of its members-Central Board of Revenue constituted in 1924 under Notification dated 29-3-192-4-Partition of the country and creation of Pakistan in 1947-Reconstitution of Central Board of Revenue afresh in Pakistan--Whether necessary-Held-no-Notification No. 3, dated 29-8-1947 appointing members of Central Board of Revenue-Whether impliedly constituted the Board-Held yes. Notification authenticated by the Secretary, Central Board of Revenue- Whether regular and proper Held yes-Pakistan (Adaptation of Existing Pakistan Laws) Order, 1947 (G.G.O. No, 20 of 1947), Article 9-Indian Independence .Act, 1947 ss. 9, 18- Indian Independence (Income tax Proceedings) Order, 1947 (G.G.O. No. 12 of 1947)--Pakistan (Adaptation of income tax, Profits tax and Revenue Recovery Acts) Order, 1947 (G.G.O. No. 2 of 1947). Case referred to:-- Abdur Rashid v. Special Judge Central (W,P. No. 1396/73, decided on 6-1-1976). C. Statutes-Consideration of a document or instrument by a court Of law-Whether as a matter of principle the intention and not merely the form of the order contained therein should be examined -Held yes-Construction of law-Whether should not lend to startling results or destructive ends-Held yes-Departmental construction- Whether can be used in aid of interpretation - Held yes. Cases referred to : Bashir Ahmad Khan v. Mahmud Ali Khan Chowdhury (P.L.D. 1960 S.C 195) ; United Netherland Navigation Co. Ltd. V. Commissioner of Income tax (P.L.D. 1965 S.C. 412; (1965) 12 Taxation 57) and Nazir Ahmad V. Pakistan and officers (P.L.D. 1970 S.C. 453). D. Income Tax Act, 1922 (Xl of 1922)-Section…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492