| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1381 2018 SLD 1381 2018 SCMR 1057 |
Supreme Court of UK
Decided on 18-04-2018. (On appeal from [2016] EWCA Civ 180) Dates of hearing: 11 and 12-10-2017.
PER LORD REED, JSCLADY HALE, LORD WILSON AND LORD CARNWATH, JJSC AGREEINGLORD SUMPTION, JSC ALSO AGREEING BUT WITH HIS OWN REASONS.
Charles Bear QC and Ian Bergson (instructed by Neves Solicitors LLP Milton Keynes) for Appellants. Craig Orr QC and Mehdi Baiou (instructed by Pitmans LLP) for
Respondent.
Decided on 18-04-2018. (On appeal from [2016] EWCA Civ 180) Dates of hearing: 11 and 12-10-2017.
PER LORD REED, JSCLADY HALE, LORD WILSON AND LORD CARNWATH, JJSC AGREEINGLORD SUMPTION, JSC ALSO AGREEING BUT WITH HIS OWN REASONS.
Charles Bear QC and Ian Bergson (instructed by Neves Solicitors LLP Milton Keynes) for Appellants. Craig Orr QC and Mehdi Baiou (instructed by Pitmans LLP) for
Respondent.
MORRIS-GARNER AND ANOTHERS
VS
ONE STEP (SUPPORT) LTD
Law:
Section:
(a) Tort--- ----Invasion of property rights--- 'User damages', award of---Principles---Damages assessed by reference to the value of the use wrongfully made of property, measured by what a reasonable person would have paid for the right of user (sometimes termed "user damages") were readily awarded at common law for the invasion of property rights---Damages were available on a similar basis for the invasion of intellectual property rights. (b) Damages--- ----Common law damages for breach of contract---Principles---Such damages were intended to place the claimant in the same position as he would have been in had the contract been performed---Such damages were therefore normally based on the difference between the effect of performance and non-performance upon the claimant's situation---Where the breach of contractual obligation had caused the claimant to suffer loss, that loss should be measured or estimated as accurately and reliably as possible---Law tolerated imprecision, and there were different legal principles which could assist in estimating the claimant' loss---Contract law damages could not be awarded merely for the purpose of depriving the defendant of profits made as a result of the breach, except in exceptional circumstances---Contract law damages were not a matter of discretion; they were claimed as of right and were awarded or refused on the basis of legal principle. (c) Equity--- ----Damages in equity, award of---Principles and quantification---Damages could be awarded in substitution for an injunction or specific performance where the court had jurisdiction to grant such a remedy when the proceedings were commenced---Damages on this basis were a monetary substitute for what was lost by the withholding of the remedy---One method of quantifying damages under such head was by reference to the economic value of the right which the court had declined to enforce---Such a valuation could be arrived at by reference to the amount which the claimant might reasonably have demanded in return for the relaxation of the obligation in question. (d) Damages--- ----'Negotiating damages' (sum that the claimant could hypothetically have received in return for…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492