Case Details

Citation(s)
2018 SLG 1774 2018 SLD 1774 2018 YLR 1690
Sindh High Court
Criminal Bail Application No. S-138 of 2017, decision Dated: 06-06-2017.
SALAHUDDIN PANHWAR, JUSTICE
Ghulam Hussain Malano for Applicant. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, A.P.G. for the State.

ABDUL SATTAR

VS

THE STATE

Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 504 & 34---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, common intention---Bail, refusal of---Name of accused was mentioned in FIR with specific role---Injury was caused to prosecution witness on back of his chest below the neck; which could not be said to be vital part of his body but it had entailed impairment of organs which according to opinion of Medical Board fell under S.336, P.P.C.---Case of co-accused (admitted to bail) was distinguishable from that case of present accused because co-accused was attributed the role of causing ineffective firing---Delay in lodging FIR was no ground for grant of bail if accused appeared to be linked with alleged offence---Reasonable grounds existed for believing that accused was guilty of alleged offence---Bail was refused accordingly. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: SALAHUDDIN PANHWAR, JUSTICE:---.--- Through instant bail application, applicant is seeking post arrest bail in Crime No.57 of 2016 registered at Police Station Mehmood Abad under sections 324, 336, 504, 34, P.P.C. 2. Precisely, the relevant facts of the case are that the present applicant caused hatchet injury on the back and neck of PW Kelash with intention to commit murder, hence booked in present FIR. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant, being innocent, has been involved in this case falsely; there is delay of two days in lodging the FIR; co-accused Ghulam Mustafa has already been granted bail; injured has not sustained the injury on the vital part of the body; complainant and witnesses are related inter-se; as such according to him the present applicant is entitled for concession of bail on the point of further inquiry. 4. Learned A.P.G. has opposed the bail on the ground that present applicant has caused hatchet blow to PW Kelash with intention to commit his murder and his case is distinguishable to that of co-accused Ghulam Mustafa. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492