| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1775 2018 SLD 1775 2018 YLR 1702 |
Criminal Appeal No. 110 and Murder Reference No. 9 of 2009, decision Dated: 30-08-2017. Hearing Date : 24-04-2017.
JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE NAZEER AHEMD LANGOVE, JUSTICE
Raja Abdur Rehman for Appellant. Kamran Murtaza and Tahir Ali Baloch for the Complainant. Ameer Hamza, A.A.G. for the State.
NOOR ZAMAN
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section: 302(b)
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account corroborated by medical evidence---Accused was charged for the murder of father of the complainant by firing---Ocular account was furnished by the witnesses including the complainant---Eye-witnesses appeared and supported the contents of fard-e-bayan and identified the accused in the court---Said witnesses, without any exaggeration fully involved the accused as sole culprit with specific role of firing and committing qatl-i-amd of the deceased---Medical evidence was in line with the ocular account---Eye-witnesses were natural being residents of the same house, where the occurrence had taken place and they had no deep rooted enmity to falsely implicate the accused---Nothing had been brought on record to show that either the witnesses had made any dishonest improvement or deviated from their earlier stand recorded before the police---Circumstances established that accused being sole culprit was responsible for committing qatl-i-amd of the deceased, therefore, was liable for normal penalty of death---Appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Criminal trial--- ----Interested witness---Scope---Testimony of closely related witness---Reliance---Testimony of closely related witness could not be discarded merely on the ground of relationship with the deceased. (c) Criminal trial--- ----"Motive" and "intent"---Scope and distinction---Motive is the state of mind of accused, which can be formed even at the spur of moment, therefore, absence of motive is of no consequence; it is an impulse and desire that induces criminal action on the part of the accused---"Motive" is distinguished from "intent", which is the design with which the act is done---Absence of motive, cannot be helpful in presence of unimpeachable ocular evidence. (d) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Sentence, defined---Quantum of sentence---Normal sentence in a murder case was death and the court while awarding the same was not under obligation to record any reason---While awarding a lesser sentence, court had to record reasons---Every possible care…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492