Case Details

Citation(s)
1975 SLG 14 1975 SLD 14 1975 PLD 893
Lahore High Court
P. T. R. No. 381 of 1972, decision dated: 19th February 1975. dates of hearing: 26th, 27th November and 16th December 1974
MUHAMMAD AKRAM AND MUNAWAR ELAHEE RANA, JJ
Sh. Abdul Haq for Petitioner

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, LAHORE ZONE, LAHORE

VS

MESSRS POPULAR ENGINEERING WORKS, BUREWALA

Law: Income Tax Act, 1922

Section: 22,22(4),23(2),23(4)

Income-tax Act (XI of 1922)---Ss. 22(4), 23(2) & 23(4)-Notices issued under Ss. 22(4) & 23(2) for 28-8-71 duly served but assessee failing to appear on 28-8-71-Income­tax Officer thereafter on 30-8-71 passing ex parte assessment order under S. 23(4)-Contention that ex parte order of assessment passed on 30.8-71 not having been passed on 28-8-71, i.e., the date of default of appearance, was illegal without a fresh notice-Contention, held, not valid. Wharton's Law Lexicon, 14th Edn. and Commissioner of Income-tax v. M. B. Qureshi T. R. No. 203 of 1972 ref. JUDGMENT MUNAWAR ELAHEE RANA, J.-The Commissioner of Income-tax, Lahore, has referred the following question of law to the High Court for its opinion under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act (XI of 1922). This reference has arisen out of an order dated 9-8-1972, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Pakistan, Multan in I. T. A. No. 3412 of 1971-72, setting aside the assessment for the assessment year 1970-71: "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the Income-tax Officer could resort to action under section 23 (4) of the Income-tax Act on 28-8-1971 only when the default occurred and not on any subsequent date." 2. The brief facts of the case are. that the respondent-assessee derives income from repairing Agricultural Tools and Manufacturing Engines. For the assessment year 1970-71 the Income-tax Officer issued notices under sections 22(4) and 23 (2) of the Income-tax Act for 26-4-1971. On service of the notices the respondent appeared before the Income-tax Officer on that date, but did not produce the accounts as the same were not main­tained. The Income-tax Officer was not satisfied, he adjourned the hearing and issued fresh notices under sections 22(4) and 23 (2) of the Act for 28-8-1971 which were duly served, but the respondent neither appeared on the appointed date nor produced the account books, and the Income-tax Officer passed the following order: "None present, please report whether any application for adjournment was received." It was reported by the office the same day that no application seeking an adjournment was received. The…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492