| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 2429 2020 SLD 2429 2020 MLD 2039 |
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeals Nos. 61 and 71 of 2018, decided on 18th December, 2019, Date of hearing: 12th November, 2019.
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, JUSTICE, ROZI KHAN BARRECH, JUSTICE
Syed Ayaz Zahoor and Rubina Shaheen for Appellants. Allaudin Saeed for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Abdul Mateen, DPG for the State.
Criminal Acquittal Appeals Nos. 61 and 71 of 2018, decided on 18th December, 2019, Date of hearing: 12th November, 2019.
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, JUSTICE, ROZI KHAN BARRECH, JUSTICE
Syed Ayaz Zahoor and Rubina Shaheen for Appellants. Allaudin Saeed for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Abdul Mateen, DPG for the State.
SALEEM IQBAL AND ANOTHERS
VS
MUHAMMAD ASHIQ AND OTHERS
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Accused was charged for committing murder of the husband of complainant by firing---Record showed that wife of the deceased/complainant was eye-witness of the case and during investigation they were booked as the accused---No one had come forward to furnish the ocular account of the incident, thus, it was an unseen occurrence---Prosecution case was full of contradictions and manner and mode of occurrence was highly doubtful and the evidence produced in support of its case was not confidence inspiring---Appeal against acquittal was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Criminal trial-- ----Circumstantial evidence---Scope---Prosecution must ensure, that the circumstances from which the inference of guilt was sought to be drawn must be cogently and firmly established---Circumstances must unerringly point towards the guilt of the accused and when taken cumulatively, they should form a chain so completed that it must demonstrate in all probabilities that the crime was committed by the accused. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Confession, recording of---Infirmities---Effect---Accused was charged for committing murder of the husband of complainant by firing---Record showed that wife of the deceased/complainant became eye-witness of the case and during investigation she was also booked as accused---Accused persons were produced before the Judicial Magistrate for recording statements under S.164, Cr.P.C. whereby the accused was given an opportunity to cross-examine the co-accused persons---Accused was produced before Judicial Magistrate for recording his statement under S.164 Cr.P.C., whereafter the statement of said accused was recorded and issued certificates---Neither the Judicial Magistrate called on the said date the co-accused persons nor gave them any opportunity for cross-examination while recording statement of accused under S.164, Cr.P.C.---When co-accused was produced before the Judicial Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate did not record her statement and notice was issued to…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492