Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 2429 2020 SLD 2429 2020 MLD 2039
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeals Nos. 61 and 71 of 2018, decided on 18th December, 2019, Date of hearing: 12th November, 2019.
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR, JUSTICE, ROZI KHAN BARRECH, JUSTICE
Syed Ayaz Zahoor and Rubina Shaheen for Appellants. Allaudin Saeed for
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3. Abdul Mateen, DPG for the State.

SALEEM IQBAL AND ANOTHERS

VS

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ AND OTHERS

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Accused was charged for committing murder of the husband of complainant by firing---Record showed that wife of the deceased/complainant was eye-witness of the case and during investigation they were booked as the accused---No one had come forward to furnish the ocular account of the incident, thus, it was an unseen occurrence---Prosecution case was full of contradictions and manner and mode of occurrence was highly doubtful and the evidence produced in support of its case was not confidence inspiring---Appeal against acquittal was dismissed, in circumstances. (b) Criminal trial-- ----Circumstantial evidence---Scope---Prosecution must ensure, that the circumstances from which the inference of guilt was sought to be drawn must be cogently and firmly established---Circumstances must unerringly point towards the guilt of the accused and when taken cumulatively, they should form a chain so completed that it must demonstrate in all probabilities that the crime was committed by the accused. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Confession, recording of---Infirmities---Effect---Accused was charged for committing murder of the husband of complainant by firing---Record showed that wife of the deceased/complainant became eye-witness of the case and during investigation she was also booked as accused---Accused persons were produced before the Judicial Magistrate for recording statements under S.164, Cr.P.C. whereby the accused was given an opportunity to cross-examine the co-accused persons---Accused was produced before Judicial Magistrate for recording his statement under S.164 Cr.P.C., whereafter the statement of said accused was recorded and issued certificates---Neither the Judicial Magistrate called on the said date the co-accused persons nor gave them any opportunity for cross-examination while recording statement of accused under S.164, Cr.P.C.---When co-accused was produced before the Judicial Magistrate, the Judicial Magistrate did not record her statement and notice was issued to…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492