Case Details

Citation(s)
2018 SLG 909 2018 SLD 909 2018 YLR 970
Federal Shariat Court
Criminal Appeal No. 41-L of 2005, decision Dated: 20-10-2017. Hearing Date : 18-10-2017.
DR. FIDA MUHAMMAD KHAN, JUSTICE, MEHMOOD MAQBOOL BAJWA, JUSTICE
Ch. Abdul Waheed for Appellant. Malik Asif Mehmood Nissoana for
Respondents. Rai Mushtaq Ahmad, DPP for the State.

ZULFIQAR ALI

VS

SARFRAZ AHMED AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

(a) Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)--- ----Ss.10 & 11---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2-A)---Zina-bil-jabr, liable to tazir, kidnapping, abducting or inducting woman to compel for marriage etc.---Appeal against acquittal---Appreciation of evidence---Delay of about four days in lodging FIR---Accused was charged for the commission of zina-bil-jabr with the daughter of complainant---Accused and his co-accused persons had fled away taking the victim with them---Occurrence took place on 5th March, 2003 at 9.00 p.m.---Victim was brought to the house of complainant on 7th March, 2003---Complainant submitted application to get the FIR recorded on 8th March, 2003, upon the strength of which crime report was lodged on 9th March, 2003---Complainant justified the delay in lodging FIR by adding in report that respectables of the locality were requested for compromise but their names and other particulars were not disclosed---Said omission was significant, deliberate and thus fatal to the case of complainant. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 154---FIR---Delay in lodging FIR---Scope---Delay in lodging FIR could be ignored if the ocular account was found convincing and trustworthy. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 161---Statement of witnesses before police---Delay---Effect---Statement of complainant and victim were recorded after the delay of three days---Statements of witnesses, complainant and victim did not suggest any compulsion to justify such delay---Witnesses were nowhere suggested of any malice on the part of Investigating Officer to justify the delay---Reliance could not be placed upon the statements of the witnesses. (d) Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VII of 1979)--- ----Ss.10 & 11---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417(2-A)---Zina-bil-jabr, liable to tazir, kidnapping, abducting or inducting woman to compel for marriage etc.---Appeal against acquittal---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account was furnished by the witnesses including complainant and the victim---First Information Report showed that the victim was laid to earth by the accused and his…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492