Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 665 2020 SLD 665 2020 SCMR 460
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Jail Petition No. 847 of 2018, decision & hearing Date : 08-01-2020 (Against judgment Dated 15.11.2018 of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench passed in Criminal Appeal No. 539 of 2017)
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Malik Jawwad Khalid, Advocate Supreme Court Muhammad Jaffar, Additional Prosecutor-General Punjab for the State.

SHAZIA BIBI

VS

THE STATE

Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997

Section: 9(c)

Law: Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001

Section: 6

(a) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Possession of four kilograms of cannabis---Reappraisal of evidence---Accused lady was apprehended from within a public vehicle and found in possession of 4 kgs. of cannabis---Plea of accused that she had been targeted as a scapegoat by the police, who had enmity with her husband---Held, that quantity recovered from accused was substantial in volume/weight, which could not possibly be foisted upon a female to victimize her husband, who himself was the most suitable target, if at all the police had an axe to grind against him---Evidence of all the prosecution witnesses including those of recovery was in tune with one another---Soon after her arrest, the accused was produced before a Magistrate who remitted her into judicial custody, but the accused did not raise any protest at such opportune occasion, and her silence went a long way to rebut the belatedly related story that otherwise may not be plausible---Conviction of accused under S. 9(c) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and resultant sentence of four years' imprisonment with fine of Rs. 20,000 was upheld---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed. (b) Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001--- ----R. 6---Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotics---Report of Government Analyst---Protocols/procedure---Scope---Substantial/sufficient compliance with R. 6 of the Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001 ('Rule 6')---Plea on behalf of accused that forensic report in the present case did not mention the details of protocols used, as such the nature of contraband was never established---Held, that tests carried out by the analyst were vividly mentioned in his report, under the heading "Test Performed on Received Item(s) of Evidence" followed by the heading "Results and Conclusions"---Said details in the forensic report substantially/sufficiently qualified to meet the statutory requirements under R. 6 of Control of Narcotic Substances (Government Analysts) Rules, 2001---Conviction of accused under S. 9(c) of Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492