| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 1649 2020 SLD 1649 2020 CLC 1429 |
Supreme Court (AJ&K)
Civil Appeal No. 201 of 2019, decision Dated: 28-01-2020, Date of hearing: 14-01-2020. (On appeal from the judgment of the High Court Dated 12-9-2018 in Writ Petition No. 1691 of 2016).
RAJA SAEED AKRAM KHAN, JUSTICE
Sardar M.R. Khan, Advocate for Appellant. Raja Inamullah Khan, Advocate-General for
Respondents Nos.1 to 3.
Civil Appeal No. 201 of 2019, decision Dated: 28-01-2020, Date of hearing: 14-01-2020. (On appeal from the judgment of the High Court Dated 12-9-2018 in Writ Petition No. 1691 of 2016).
RAJA SAEED AKRAM KHAN, JUSTICE
Sardar M.R. Khan, Advocate for Appellant. Raja Inamullah Khan, Advocate-General for
Respondents Nos.1 to 3.
CHAUDHARY ABDUL LATIF
VS
AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND 6 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
Establishment of Office of Mohtasib (Ombudsman) in Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act (XIV of 1992)--- ----Ss. 32 & 11---Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), S.44---Writ petition before High Court---Maintainability---Contract for construction of a project---Claim for loss caused due to change of site plan---Compensation awarded by the Ombudsman---Petitioner-contractor moved an application to the Ombudsman for payment of loss caused to him due to change of site plan on behalf of the department---Ombudsman passed directions for payment of loss to the contractor but same was not paid---Petitioner filed writ petition before the High Court for implementation of order of Ombudsman---Writ petition was dismissed on the grounds that there was no violation of law and factual controversy had been raised which could not be resolved in writ jurisdiction---Validity---Petitioner had suffered loss due to delay in execution of project and change of site plan---Loss caused to the contractor had been assessed in the present matter---Respondents had participated in the inquiry proceedings before Ombudsman---No representation had been filed on behalf of respondents nor any reason for non-compliance of direction of Ombudsman had been assigned---Respondents had admitted the findings of Ombudsman in written statement filed before the High Court which had attained finality---Department was bound to inform the Ombudsman within specified time with regard to action taken on his direction or reasons for not complying with the same---Respondents had neither implemented the recommendations within specified time nor informed the Ombudsman with regard to reasons for not complying with the same---Department had violated the provisions of Ss. 11(2) & 22 of Establishment of the Office of Mohtasib (Ombudsman) in Azad Jammu and Kashmir Act, 1992, in circumstances---Compensation awarded by the Ombudsman was recoverable as arrear of land revenue from the public servant, functionary or agency---Writ petition had not been filed for determination of compensation but same was filed for implementation of direction of Ombudsman---High Court in writ jurisdiction could remove the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492