Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 3016 2019 SLD 3016 2019 SCMR 1930
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeal No. 396 of 2018, decision & hearing Dated: 24-09-2019. (Against the order Dated 19.01.2017 passed by Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench in C.R. No. 199 of 2008)
MUSHIR ALAM, JUSTICE QAZI FAEZ ISA, JUSTICE QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Syed Moazam Ali Rizvi, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record
Respondent(s) by: Syed Hamid Ali Shah Bokhari, Advocate Supreme Court and Tariq Aziz, Advocate-on-Record

FAZAL ELLAHI (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS

VS

MST. ZAINAB BI

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 42,54

Law: Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1967

Section: 42

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 42 & 54---Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S. 42---Suit for declaration---Mutation of sale, vires of---Fraud---Plaintiff assailed sale mutation in favour of defendant on ground of fraud---Suit was dismissed by Trial Court but Lower Appellate Court decreed the same in favour of plaintiff---Single Judge of High Court maintained and decree passed by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---Mutation by itself did not create title unless demonstrated to be backed by a valid transaction---Sale without vendor or by his duly authorized attorney/agent was a farce---Objection to limitation was beside mark in as much as reference to instituting a suit for possession through pre-emption by no other than plaintiff herself was a far cry as well and nothing was placed on record throughout proceedings before courts below to obliquely suggest that plaintiff ever instituted any suit for same piece of land---Documents placed for first time before Supreme Court were also devoid of relevant details--- Supreme Court declined to interfere in the matter as transaction in question was found with strappings of deceit---Fraud had vitiated both solemn proceedings and period of limitation did not embargo a justiciable claim directed against fraud---Appeal was dismissed in circumstances. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: QAZI MUHAMMAD AMIN AHMED, J.--- Mst. Zainab Bi, respondent herein, had been non-suited by a learned Civil Judge, at Kahuta vide judgment and decree dated 17.5.2006; praying for a declaration, she disputed vires of mutation No.596 dated 14.8.1970, purportedly entered in consequence of a sale effected by her father, Alif, incapacitated by paralysis, in favour of appellants' predecessor-in-interest; alleging fraud, she prayed for consequential reliefs. A learned Additional District Judge vide judgment and decree dated 22.5.2008, reversed the findings returned by the learned Trial Court and decreed the suit, a decision subsequently affirmed by a learned Judge-in-Chambers of Lahore High Court Rawalpindi Bench Rawalpindi, being assailed, by leave of the Court, on a variety of grounds, ranging from a duly mutated valid transaction, expiry…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492