Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 2128 2019 SLD 2128 2019 PLJ 425
Lahore High Court
Office Objection Diary No. 220363 of 2018, decision & hearing Dated: 18.03.2019.
MUHAMMAD QASIM KHAN, JUSTICE SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JUSTICE CH. ABDUL AZIZ, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Afrasiab Mohal, Advocate

MST. FARHAT BIBI ETC.

VS

SHO, ETC.

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860

Section: 365B

Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Pakistan Penal Code, (XLV of 1860), S. 365-B--Constitutional Petition--Quashing of FIR--Official Objection--Abductee of case--Aggrieved party--Maintainability--It is not requirement of any law that petitioner before approaching this Court in its constitutional jurisdiction for quashing of FIR may firstly obtain bail from a Court of competent jurisdiction--For what has been discussed above, office objection being alien in scheme of law, is not sustainable and is overruled. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: CH. ABDUL AZIZ, JUSTICE---.--- Mst. Farhat Bibi (petitioner) who is an abductce of case FIR No. 178/2018 registered under Section 365-B, PPC at Police Station Shah Pur Sadar, Sargodha, through the instant writ petition has sought quashing of said FIR on multifarious grounds, but the office has raised objection on maintainability of constitutional petition for quashing of FIR without bringing on file the copy of bail granting order. 2. We have heard the respective arguments of learned counsel for the parties. 3. This Court in another Office Objection No. 245164 of 2018 "Mst. Nazia versus State through SHO. etc" vide an order of even date has held that abductee/witness in an FIR, is not an…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492