| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2016 SLG 483 2016 SLD 483 2016 SCMR 189 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 316-K and 317-K of 2015, decided on 30th July, 2015. Date of hearing: 30th July, 2015.
SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Mukesh Kumar, Additional AG Sindh, Mazhar Ali, AIG Legal and Intezar Hussain Qureshi, PDSP Hyderabad for Petitioners.
Civil Petitions Nos. 316-K and 317-K of 2015, decided on 30th July, 2015. Date of hearing: 30th July, 2015.
SARMAD, JALAL OSMANY AND UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JJ
Mukesh Kumar, Additional AG Sindh, Mazhar Ali, AIG Legal and Intezar Hussain Qureshi, PDSP Hyderabad for Petitioners.
PROVINCE OF SINDH and another
VS
MUHAMMAD ILYAS and others
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 212(3)
Law: Sindh Service Tribunals Act, 1973
Section: 4
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 212(3)---Civil service---Dismissal from service---Grounds---Joining service belatedly---Inefficiency---Proof---Respondents were appointed as Constables (BS-5) in police department, however their appointment letters were never sent to them by registered post, nor were they ever informed about the same by telephone or verbally---Respondents collected their appointment letters from the police department through their own efforts, and immediately joined service---Dismissal of respondents in such circumstances on grounds of belatedly joining service and inefficiency was not justified---Even the letters of dismissal from service were never sent to the respondents through registered post and they were only informed about their dismissal verbally--- Supreme Court directed that respondents be reinstated in service--- Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed accordingly. (b) Sindh Service Tribunal Act (XV of 1973)--- ----S. 4---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 212(3)---Appeal against dismissal from service filed before the Service Tribunal---Limitation period, commencement of---Letter of dismissal from service not sent to civil servants---Limitation period commencing from date when letter of dismissal received--- Contention of appointing authority that respondents/civil servants were dismissed from service on 9-9-2013, but they filed their appeal before the Service Tribunal in July 2014, which was well beyond the 30 days period allowed for filing an appeal before the Tribunal---Validity---Dismissal from service letters dated 9-9-2013, were never sent to the respondents/civil servants---Respondents through their own efforts found out about their dismissal and personally collected their dismissal letters around middle of June, 2014---Subsequently respondents filed Constitutional petition before the High Court on 3-7-2014 i.e. within 30 days of collecting/receiving their dismissal letters---Said petition was treated by the High Court as an appeal and sent to the Service Tribunal---Appeal before the Service Tribunal, in such circumstances, would be treated as having been filed within 30 days from the date when respondents received…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492