| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2019 SLG 3059 2019 SLD 3059 2019 YLR 2576 |
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 652-J of 2012 and Murder Reference No.115 of 2011, heard on 15-11-2018.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Malik Muhammad Saleem
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ali Shahab, District Prosecutor General
Criminal Appeal No. 652-J of 2012 and Murder Reference No.115 of 2011, heard on 15-11-2018.
SADAQAT ALI KHAN, JUSTICE SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Malik Muhammad Saleem
Respondent(s) by: Muhammad Ali Shahab, District Prosecutor General
NOOR AHMAD AND ANOTHERVSTHE STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 109,148,149,302,302(b),324
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 161,340(2),342,374,382B,544A
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 324, 109, 148 & 149---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, abetment, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Prosecution case was that the accused party while armed with deadly weapons assaulted on complainant party, made firing thereon, as a result of firing three persons died---Motive for the occurrence was stated to be previous enmity---Record showed that prosecution case revolved around the statements of three witnesses including complainant---Said witnesses also stated the motive of the occurrence---Witnesses were brothers inter se and their relationship with the deceased was also on record---During cross-examination, complainant had admitted the existence of enmity and stated that there was allegation on them that they had committed the murder of nephew of the accused and a criminal case was registered against them---Statements of said witness showed that the accused were at a distance of about 1 karams when they were firing indiscriminately and all the witnesses and the deceased persons were face to face with the assailants at that time---Perusal of the scaled and un-scaled site plans revealed that the occurrence took place on an open road---Witnesses had stated that the common object of the accused was that no one of the family of the deceased should escape---Said three witnesses were supposed to be the prime targets of the assailants---Statement of complainant showed that it was he who had deposed against the accused persons---In fact, all the three witnesses had been vigorously pursuing the case against the accused---Said witnesses had been nominated as accused in the case relating to the murder of nephew of the accused---Said witnesses had stated that all the accused were armed with rifles and neither there was any dearth of ammunition nor of intent and opportunity---Prosecution witnesses were not fired at---One of the witnesses had admitted in his cross-examination that all the witnesses were facing the accused at the time of the firing being made by them---Record transpired that none of the said witnesses even received a single scratch…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492