Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 2157 2019 SLD 2157 2019 PLJ 122
Lahore High Court
Crl. Appeal No. 1477 of 2014, heard on 08.03.2018.
MISS AALIA NEELUM, JUSTICE KHALID MAHMOOD MALIK, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Intizar Mehdi, Advocate (Defence Counsel)
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Muhammad Waqas Anwar, Deputy Prosecutor General

MST. ZAKIA BIBI

VS

STATE AND ANOTHER

Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997

Section: 9(c),25

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 52,173,340(2),342,382B

Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 (XXV of 1997)-- ----Ss. 9(c) & 25--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--It was prosecution case that being notorious drug peddler appellant was selling heroin in public street and many people were purchasing heroin from her--On spy information, raid was conducted--Resultantly appellant was apprehended and upon search, heroin weighing 1015 grams alongwith sale proceed Rs.9990/- was allegedly recovered from her possession--Surprisingly, inspite of well and advance information about fact that appellant was a woman and notorious drug seller, complainant/head of raiding party did not try to accompany a lady constable for her arrest and search, which is clear violation of mandatory provisions of law concerning body or personal search of some lady involved in crime--Further complainant, who is Sub-Inspector by rank and being an employee of police department is supposed to well aware and having knowledge of substantive as well as procedural law but in this case, non-accompanying of lady constable with raiding party by complainant, speaks a volume about his efficiency, knowledge and command on investigation--It is pertinent to mention here that whether act of Investigating Officer was illegal or merely irregular--In this regard, several factors are to be taken into consideration such as form and language of mandatory provisions; scheme and object to be achieved; and nature of violation etc--To determine gravity of defect, it has to be seen that whether is it a mere unimportant mistake in procedure or is it substantial and vital? The answer will depend on facts and circumstances of each case--It is not possible and acceptable that raiding party comprising male members could maintain decency/modesty of a woman at time of her arrest because it is a common observation in our society that every accused either man or woman tries to show resistance to police in order to make his/her good escape from place of occurrence and police officials also make every effort to cause his/her arrest and in this eventuality, they lost sight principles of decency/modesty of a woman and could not maintain strict decency of a woman--This act and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492