| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 2625 2018 SLD 2625 2018 PCRLJ 1553 |
Sindh High Court
Cr. A.s Nos. 176 and 165 of 2006, decision Dated: 03-06-2016
NAZAR AKBAR, JUSTICE
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Cr. A.s Nos. 176 and 165 of 2006, decision Dated: 03-06-2016
NAZAR AKBAR, JUSTICE
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
MUMTAZ KHAN
VS
THE STATE
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 34,395
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 395 & 34--- Dacoity, common intention--- Appreciation of evidence---Criminal history of accused had disclosed that he was involved in ten other cases---Accused appeared to be a hardened criminal and absconding---Station House Officer of the concerned Police Station had failed to arrest the accused despite sufficient time was given to him---Surety in the case of accused was the same person, who stood surety for different criminals in other cases---Said surety had furnished surety in the last mentioned FIR by submitting false and forged documents of a bus---Surety documents furnished by the surety in the case of accused, were the lease documents---Nazir of the court was directed by High Court to sell out the property furnished by surety within 15 days---High Court directed the office of Prosecutor General that in all the cases pending in the High court, CROs should be obtained on the first date of hearing and placed in the court file. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: NAZAR AKBAR, JUSTICE:---.--- In compliance of the Court order dated 02.06.2016, SIP Abid Hussain Shah of Police Station ACLC, Karachi has collected the information both about the absconding Appellant and the Surety, Arshad Ali son of Nasir Ali. 2. The criminal history of the Appellant as disclosed in the CROs show that the absconding Appellant Mumtaz Khan in Cr. Appeal No. 176/2006 was found involved in 10 cases. Copy of the CRO has also been placed on record. The Appellant on perusal of CRO appears to be a hardened criminal and absconding, not only the SHO, ACLC has failed to arrest him despite sufficient time given but I am sure other SHOs of different Police Stations in which other cases were registered must have failed in their duty to apprehend the hardened criminal. The CRO is silent about the status of case mentioned therein. 3. SIP, Abid Hussain Shah of Police Station ACLC, Karachi, undertakes that he will arrest the absconding convict by the next date of hearing i.e. 11.08.2016. 4. The surety in this case is the same person who stood surety for different criminals in the following cases. 1. FIR No. 275/2015, under section 381-H, Police Station ACLC, Karachi; 2.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492