Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 1287 2019 SLD 1287 2019 SCMR 998
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 110-L and 111-L of 2013, decision & hearing Dated: 09-03-2016. (On appeal against the orders Dated 7.6.2012 passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in I.C.As. Nos. 11 and 142 of 2011)
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mudassar Khalid Abbasi, AAG (in both cases).
Respondent(s) by: Hafiz Tariq Naseem, Advocate Supreme Court and Tariq Nadeem, Advocate Supreme Court No.1 (in both cases).

GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY COMMUNICATION AND WORKS DEPARTMENT LAHORE AND ANOTHER

VS

MUNIR AHMAD TARIQ AND OTHERS

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 11

Law: Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974 

Section: 10(3)

(a) Civil service--- ----Where a Tribunal or Court decided a point of law relating to terms and conditions of service of civil servants which governed not only those who litigated but also those who had not resorted to any legal proceedings, then irrespective of this they (non-litigating civil servants) too became entitled to the same benefit. Hameed Akhtar Niazi v. Secretary Establishment Division, Government of Pakistan 1996 SCMR 1185 ref. (b) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----S. 11---Constructive res-judicata---Where an omnibus order was passed and a party to a case accepted a decision passed against it, then it could not subsequently take advantage of the fact that such decision upon challenge by some other party before a higher forum stood reversed and ask for the same relief to be granted to him also---Such bar was based on the principle of constructive res judicata. Pir Bukhsh v. Chairman Allotment Committee PLD 1987 SC 145 ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: FAISAL ARAB, J.--- Through this judgment we propose to dispose of the above-titled civil appeals as in both the cases common questions of facts and law are involved. 2. On 20.06.1996 the respondents were appointed as sub-engineers on ad-hoc basis for a period of one year. Before expiry of one year period their services along with certain other ad-hoc employees, who were appointed as sub-engineers, highway inspectors, junior clerks, truck driver, fitter, store keeper, tube-well operator and chowkidar were terminated through an omnibus order dated 30.09.1996. They challenged their termination and succeeded in getting injunctive order until their one year tenure as ad-hoc employees expired on 18.6.1997. The present respondents accepted this legal position and went home upon expiry of one year period. 3. After a period of 14 years of their termination from service, the respondents filed writ petitions in the Lahore High Court seeking reinstatement back in service on the basis of a decision of this Court delivered on 18.1.2010 in Civil Appeals Nos. 568/2006 and other connected appeals. In the said connected appeals, certain employees, who were appointed on work-charge basis had sought reinstatement…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492