Law: Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972

Section: 3

Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972 (XII of 1972)-- ----S. 3--Termination of service--Constitutional Petition--Allowed--Reinstated in service from date of termination--Compliance of order--Challenge to--Whether respondents could be treated differently when similarly placed other persons, pursuant to impugned order, have joined service and order passed by learned Single Judge has been complied with and thereafter their appeal was disposed of in above terms, learned Law Officer replied that said order is under challenge before Hon'ble Supreme Court--Since in this case as well, impugned order has been complied with--In circumstances, we are not inclined, to interfere in matter and this appeal, along with connected appeals, has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly--Appeal was disposed of. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: ASIM HAFEEZ, JUSTICE---.--- This consolidated order shall dispose of instant appeal along with following connected, appeals as common questions of law and facts are involved in these cases:-- 1. I.C.A. No. 42 of 2013 titled Executive District Officer (Health), Vehari v. Ghulam Murtaza & others. 2. I.C.A. No. 33 of 2015 titled Government of Punjab through Secretary, Health Department, Lahore & others v. Shakil Ahmad. 2. Through instant appeal, appellants have assailed order dated 10.1.2013, passed by learned Single Judge in Chambers, whereby constitutional petition filed by respondents, was allowed and respondents were directed to be reinstated into service from the dates of termination of their services. 3. Learned Law Officer…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492