Case Details

Citation(s)
2018 SLG 1006 2018 SLD 1006 2018 PCRLJ 174
Peshawar High Court
Cr. Misc. B.A. No. 31-M of 2017, decision Dated: 8-03-2017, hearing Dates: 23rd February and 8th March, 2017.
MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN, JUSTICE
Raja Rizwan Abbasi for Petitioner. Ms. Mehnaz, State counsel and Irfan Ahmad Khan, Shujjah Ullah and Qaiser Iman for

MUHAMMAD SAAD NASEEM

VS

THE STATE AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 489-F---Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Bail, grant of---Further inquiry---Complainant had alleged that he invested with the accused-petitioner an amount of Rs. One million for business, and an agreement was executed to that effect---Later on, complainant came to know that accused-petitioner was a swindler who had already defrauded many persons, so he demanded his invested amount---On demanding the invested amount, accused-petitioner issued cheque for an amount of Rs. six lac, however the cheque was dishonored on presentation---Complainant had alleged that there were plethora of cases registered against the accused-petitioner, which led to an inference that there were exceptions to the grant of bail to the accused-petitioner being involved in cases of fraud committed with a number of persons---Validity---Admittedly, number of cases were registered against the accused-petitioner but bail had been extended to the accused-petitioner in those cases---Record showed that complainant of the case was of dubious character being involved in the case registered under S. 489-F, Penal Code, 1860 and bail had been extended to the complainant in that case---In the present case, accused-petitioner was said to have committed fraud when a cheque issued by him had been dishonored for an amount of Rs. Six lac---In case of cross claims by cheaters who exchanged cheques which had been dishonored, circumstances would bring the case of accused-petitioner within the scope of further inquiry as to who amongst the rival claimants had in fact cheated the other---Punishment for the offence did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.---Accused was allowed bail in circumstances. Muhammad Sarfaraz v. The State and others 2014 SCMR 1032 and Ghulam Mohy-ud-Din alias Haji Babu v. The State 2014 SCMR 1034 ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM KHAN, JUSTICE:---.--- Muhammad Saad Naseem Petitioner herein, entrapped in case FIR No. 1086 dated 04.11.2016 charged under section 489-F, P.P.C. registered at Police Station Timergara District Dir Lower is optimistic for the grant of bail after…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492