Law:

Section:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)---- --------O. XLVII, R. 1----Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, Art. 188----Power to review its own ----Grounds of review----Errors in ----Validity----Review jurisdiction does not allow re-hearing of decided cases more so when Courts has given conscious and deliberate decision on point of law as well as of fact while disposing of constitution petitioner before it----Grounds not urged or raised at time of hearing of constitution petition cannot be allowed to be raised in review proceedings----Court at time of handing over under review was fully conscious of its implications and had in mind all issues which were raised for review petitioners----Petition was dismissed. PLD 1997 SC 865, 2008 SCMR 554 & 2008 SCMMR 1590, ref. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: GULZAR AHMED, JUSTICE:---.--- By this Civil Review Petition, the petitioners namely Engineers Study Forum (Regd) and another have sought review of the judgment dated 08.01.2015 passed in C.P. Nos. 32/1996, 45/1998, 37/2000, 44/2002, 39/2005, 104/2011, Civil Petition No. 887/2008 and Crl. Org. Petition No. 91/2006. This Review petition has been filed only by the petitioners of C.P.No. 104/2011. 2. On 18.7.2016 this Review Petition had come up for hearing before the Court. Learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners was heard and that after having heard the learned Sr. ASC for review petitioners at sufficient length, the Court passed the order of reserving the judgment and asked the learned Sr. ASC for petitioners to file written submissions, which the learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners has filed. He has also filed a CMA No. 5135/2016 praying for grant of adequate opportunity of hearing. 3. We have considered the submissions of Mr. A.K. Dogar, learned Sr. ASC for the review petitioners. 4. We would first take up CMA No. 5135 of 2016 of review petitioners in which their counsel purports to seek opportunity of adequate hearing as he has asserted in the application that his 90% arguments remained unheard by the Court and has referred to the case of Imranullah v. The Crown [PLD 1954 FC 123]. The case cited is altogether distinguishable from the features of present case as it…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492