Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 1333 2017 SLD 1333 2017 SCMR 1727
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 301-L of 2009, decided on 24th May, 2017. Heard on: 24th May, 2017. (On appeal from the judgment of the Lahore High Court, Lahore Dated 22.05.2009 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 389 of 2003 and Murder Reference No. 46 of 2004)
MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE, SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, JUSTICE, MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE
Akhtar Nawaz Raja, Advocate Supreme Court for Appellant. Mazhar Sher Awan, Additional P.G. for the State.

ARSHAD BEG

VS

THE State.

Law:

Section:

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---.--- ---.----S. 302(b)---.---Qatl-i-amd---.---Reappraisal of evidence---.---Occurrence took place in broad daylight and was reported to the police with due promptitude as the FIR was registered just one hour after the occurrence---.---Ocular account was furnished by brothers of the deceased, and they were cross-examined by the defence at length but they remained consistent on all material aspects of the case---.---Even otherwise present case was a case of a single accused and substitution in such like cases was a rare phenomenon as normally kith and kin of the deceased (in present case real brothers) would not implicate an innocent person by letting off the real culprits---.---Both the witnesses of ocular account were present at the spot and had witnessed the occurrence---.---Ocular account was substantially supported by medical evidence---.---Prosecution case stood proved against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt and his conviction under S. 302(b), P.P.C. was fully justified---.---Appeal was partly dismissed accordingly. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)---.--- ---.----S. 302(b)---.--- Qatl-i-amd---.--- Reappraisal of evidence---.--- Sentence, reduction in---.---Mitigating circumstances---.---Vague motive was set up in the FIR---.---Evidence with respect to motive was furnished only by the complainant, who during his cross-examination admitted that the motive incident did not take place in his presence, and that he did not remember who told him about the said motive incident---.---Complainant also admitted that there was no enmity with the accused---.---Absence of previous enmity between the parties and a vague motive set up by the complainant, which could not be proved at trial, were mitigating circumstances to reduce the death sentence awarded to the accused---.---Sentence of death awarded to accused was altered to imprisonment for life in circumstances---.---Appeal was partly allowed accordingly. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE:---.--- Arshad Beg (appellant) was indicted in case FIR No.194/2001 dated 26.09.2001 offence under section 302, P.P.C., registered at Police Station Tanda, District Gujrat.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492