Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 957 2017 SLD 957 2017 PLJ 239

W.P. No. 6976 of 2016, decided on 5.9.2016. Date of hearing: 5.9.2016.
CH. MUHAMMAD IQBAL, JUSTICE
Mr. Sajjad Hussain Tangra, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Saleem Akhtar Warraich, Advocate for
Respondents.

SALMAN SHAHZAD, ETC.

VS

CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MULTAN, ETC. --RespondentS

Law:

Section:

Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Constitutional petition--Employee's son quota--Posts of teacher--Criteria of two years diploma was not fulfilled--Validity--Required qualification was matric with two years C.D.D. from recognized government institution, whereas, petitioners possessed three years diploma of as such, they had failed to fulfill prescribed criteria as required under law--It is settled law that High Court cannot substitute opinion of recruitment/department selection committee--Petitioners has not been able to point out any illegality or material irregularity in recruitment process of D.S.C. and has also not identified any jurisdictional defect. 2015 SCMR 112, ref. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: CH. MUHAMMAD IQBAL, JUSTICE:---.--- Through this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed as under:-- In view of above, it is humbly prayed, that this writ petition may kindly be graced with acceptance and the respondents may kindly be directed to recommend the name of the petitioners against the vacant/unfilled post of TRACER (BPS-7), and respondents further may kindly be directed to issue letter of appointment for TRACER in BPS-7 immediately to the petitioners in the supreme interest of justice. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that Respondent No. 2/MEPCO through a consolidated advertisement published 48 posts of TRACER (38 posts for open merits & 10 for employee son Quota) in a National Daily Newspaper in which the prescribed qualification for the above said post was Matric with two years Civil Draftsman Diploma from the recognized government institution; that the petitioners filed applications having three years Diploma of Associate Engineer in Civil Technology in which they appeared in NTS papers and obtained 36 marks (Petitioner No. 1) & 38 marks (Petitioner No. 2) respectively and the petitioners were interviewed but they have not been selected by Respondent No. 1. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the petitioners have filed applications against the post of TRACER (BPS-7) but they did not fulfill the prescribed criteria of two years Civil Draftsman Diploma, as…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492