Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 2676 2019 SLD 2676 2019 PLJ 1388
Peshawar High Court
Crl. Misc. Q. P. No. 17-B of 2019, decision & hearing Dated: 22.04.2019.
MUHAMMAD NASIR MAHFOOZ, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Naseebur Rehman, Advocate

MST. RIFAT RANA

VS

RASHID MAHMOOD & 4 OTHERS

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 145,561A

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 561-A & 145--Quashment petition--Apprehension of breach of peace--Matter in issue was subjudice Section 145 Cr.PC are meant to avoid breach of peace and in no way amounts to be decided after discussing a title dispute or a dispute of restoration of possession--Provision of Section 9 of Specific Relief Act or Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005 are specifically meant to cater for such like eventualities that could not be made redundant--Section 145 Cr.PC lays down that complaint is to be represented with proof of dispossession within two months of filing of complaint, but instant application of petitioner submitted to District Police Officer, Bannu does not reveal any specific date or period, but merely bald allegation of dispossession--Moreover, petitioner and respondents are sisters and brothers interse and no doubt that former might have claimed to share in disputed property, but same could not be adjudicated upon under Section 145 Cr.PC that has got a very limited scope and infringement of private right or dispossession of any of parties or existence of dispute relating to immovable property is per se not enough to attract provision of Section 145 Cr.PC--It is only meant to meet an emergent situation posing threat to peace and could not be used for settling right of parties or their claim to title--Import of sub Section 5 makes it clear and there is no breach of peace then a Magistrate has got no jurisdiction to make order regarding subject of dispute--Petition was dismissed. PLD 1985 Supreme Court 294, ref. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD NASIR MAHFOOZ, JUSTICE---.--- Through instant quashment petition, the petitioner has called in question the order dated 9.1.2019 of learned Sessions Judge, Bannu, whereby revision petition of respondents was accepted and set aside the order dated 22.10.218 of learned Judicial Magistrate, Bannu, consequently complainant of petitioner was dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner submitted an application regarding her forcible dispossession by respondents from the house to the District Police Officer, Bannu, who after inquiry submitted complaint under…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492