Case Details

Citation(s)
2018 SLG 1520 2018 SLD 1520 2018 YLR 1353

Criminal Appeals Nos. 967, 995 of 2011 and Criminal Revision No. 299 of 2012, heard on 06-12-2017.
2017, ABDUL SAMI KHAN, JUSTICE, SYED SHAHBAZ ALI RIZVI, JUSTICE
Mian Muhammad Sikandar Hayat for Appellant (in Crl. Appeal No.967 of 2011). Khurram Khan, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State. Muhammad Taqi Khan for the Complainant. Rana Ijaz Ahmad Khan for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 (in Crl. Appeal No.995 of 2011).

MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ

VS

THE STATE AND ANOTHER

Law:

Section: 302,460

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302 & 460---Qatl-i-amd, persons jointly concerned in lurking house-trespass or house-breaking by night punishable for qatl or hurt caused by one of them---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Ocular account---Scope---Charge against accused was that he along with co-accused persons committed murder of the father of the complainant---Eye-witnesses including complainant had identified the accused and one of the co-accused at the time of occurrence---Ocular account of the occurrence had been furnished by the witnesses including complainant---Eye-witnesses had stated that on the relevant night, accused along with co-accused and acquitted accused persons trespassed in the house and his father was done to death as a result of fire shot made by co-accused---Said co-accused had already been done to death in a police encounter and he was no more in the case---Complainant in his statement recorded under S.154, Cr.P.C. and before the court had not disclosed about the availability of any source of light at the place of occurrence on the night of occurrence, through which he identified the accused---Same was the position of eye-witness, who had not disclosed the availability of any such source of light through which the accused was identified---Availability of source of light at the place of occurrence was not mentioned in the site plan---Record was silent as to how the eye-witnesses had identified the accused in the darkness of night---Presence of co-accused at the spot was shown in the site plan---Role ascribed by complainant and eye-witness to accused that he had grasped deceased when co-accused made straight fire shot with 12-bore gun on the right side of abdomen of the deceased itself raised doubt about his involvement---Fist Information Report showed that assailants were unable to snatch anything from the deceased as he had no money with him at the time of occurrence---Complainant introduced new facts and stated that the accused snatched money which was in possession of the deceased---Complainant had departed from his previous version and stated that accused had lifted the rifle from the room, but no such specific…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492