Law:

Section:

Keywords: Criminal Proceedings, Malicious Prosecution, Suit For Recovery, Competent Forum, Grievance, Privacy Of Home, Concession Of Bail, Impugned Judgment, Privy Council, Court Of Law, Inalienable Right, Provincial Assembly, Competent Court Of Law, Fraudulent, Pre-Arrest Bail, Compensation, District Council, Power Of Attorney, Business Loss, Barred By Time, Dignity Of Man, Naib Nazim, Trial Court, Criminal Charge, Investigation, Reasonable Cause Muhammad Khalid Mehmood Khan, J. The appellants filed a suit for recovery of Rs.11.800,600/- against the respondents claiming that appellant No.1 is an advocate by profession, the appellant No.2 is Government employee as well as landlord, the appellant No.3 is the son of appellant No.1 and was studying in B.A at the relevant time, all the appellants were enjoying good reputation in the society, specially in their Baradri, the appellant No.1 remained the member of different committee run and managed by the Government as well as the Secretary District Bar Association, Chunian, the detail of his membership of different committee and District Bar Association is given in para 2 of the plaint. 2. The respondent No.1 lodged an FIR No.222/2001 under Section 458/380/411/107/171 and 365 PPC against unknown culprits and subsequently the offence of 395 PPC was added in the FIR. The respondents with the malafide intention through a supplementary statement involved the appellants in the case referred to above. The appellants asserted that the respondents are very well aware about the character and reputation of the appellants as both the parties are the residents of the same village. The respondents can easily recognize the appellants if they were involved in the incident of dacoity. The appellants were investigated by the police and they were found innocent. After the appellants' discharge by the competent court of law, the respondents continued to get the appellants investigated by the Range Crimes Branch and DSP (CIA) Kasur but the appellants in every investigation were found innocent, that due to malafide and malice of the respondents the appellants' reputation was damaged, they suffered mental and health loss, the appellant…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492