Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 1761 2016 SLD 1761 2016 LHC 296
Lahore High Court
Crl. Rev. No. 350 of 2015, 25.01.2016
ASLAM, JAVED MINHAS, J

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Muhammad Ilyas

VS

The State Etc.

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Summon Persons, Impugned Order, Determination Of Age, Trial Court, Date Of Birth, Juvenile Justice System Through this criminal revision, order dated 21.09.2015 has been called in question whereby application filed by respondent No.2 to declare him juvenile in murder case under section 7 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 before learned Addl: Sessions Judge, Muzaffargarh was dismissed. 2. Brief facts of the case are that respondents No.2 filed an application to declare him as juvenile and learned trial Court after receiving report of Medical Board rejected the same vide order dated 15.01.2013. After two years of said order, respondent No.2 again filed application under section 7 of Juvenile Justice System Ordinance for determination of re-ossification test, which was also rejected by learned trial Court vide order dated 21.07.2014, which was assailed by respondent No.2 before this Court and the same was set-aside vide order dated 04.06.2015 passed in Crl. Revision No.254/2014. That the learned trial Court despite following direction of learned trial Court, declared respondent No.2 juvenile vide order dated 25.06.2015, which was assailed by the petitioner/complainant before this Court and the same was accepted and case was remanded back vide order dated 30.07.2015 to decide afresh after determining the genuineness of documents, but learned trial Court while ignoring the evidence produced before him by the petitioner passed impugned order dated 21.09.2015 and declare the respondent No.2 as minor at the time of occurrence, hence this revision petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the impugned order passed by learned ASJ Muzaffargarh is illegal and result of misreading of record. That in Nikah Nama of the respondent No.2 with Qurat-ul-Ain dated 10.06.2015 age of respondent No.2 is 19-years whereas according to report of Medical Board dated 10.06.2015 his age is 22-24 years. That documents produced by respondent No.2 have no authenticity but the learned trial Court should have relied on medical evidence. Lastly, he prayed for setting aside order dated 21.09.2015 passed by learned trial Court. 4. On the other hand,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492