| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 138 2018 SLD 138 2018 PLC 116 |
Writ Petition No. 3151-P of 2014, decision Date : 20-04-2016, hearing Date : 05-04-2016
YAHYA AFRIDI, JUSTICE, ROOH UL AMIN, JUSTICE
Muhammad Zafar, Tahirkheli, and Ghulam Nabi, for Petitioners. Syed Muhammad Attique Shah, Syed Arshad Hussain Shah, Additional Attorney General and Manzoor Khalil, DAG, along with Qaiser Khan Khattak, S.O, Police Department, Islamabad for
Respondents. Umar Farooq Adam, Additional Advocate General (Provincial Government). Ijaz Anwar for
Respondents.
MUHAMMAD ZAFAR ALI & 10 OTHERS
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT, ISLAMABAD & 6 OTHERS
Law:
Section:
(a) Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973)--- ----Preamble---Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules, 1985, Preamble---Provincial Police Officers---Promotion of---All Pakistan Service---Contention of petitioners being Provincial Police Officers BPS-17 was that there was no service structure for them beyond BPS-18 at provincial level---Validity---Provincial Police Officers on reaching BPS-18 would enter the All Pakistan Service and they would be governed under Civil Servants Act, 1973 and Police Service of Pakistan (Composition Cadre and Seniority) Rules, 1985---Provincial Police Officers up to BPS-17 were not to be dealt with by or under Federal Service Laws but when they reached for promotion to BPS-18 then they would enter (encadred into) the Federal Public Service and only thereafter their service would come under the Federal Service regime---Provincial Services and Federal Services were not only distinct services but had also been kept separate with their distinct allocated realm of administrative fields---Services which were common to both the Federation and Provinces had been vested in the jurisdiction of Parliament---Constitutional Court had no jurisdiction to strike down rules with regard to terms and conditions of service of a civil servant even if challenge was made on the touchstone of violation of fundamental rights---Constitutional Courts could refuse relief on the ground of jurisdiction but Government was to ensure a transparent and conducive service environment---Provincial and Federal Government should convene a joint meeting to consider the grievance of the petitioners---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. Muhammad Zafar Ali's case 2015 SCMR 365; Mian Amanul Mulk's case PLD 1981 Pesh. 1; Abdul Bari's case PLD 1987 Kar. 290 and Qamar Dost Khan's case 2006 SCMR 1630 ref. Mehrajuddin's case PLD 1959 SC (Pak) 147; Wood v. Riley (1867) LR 3 CP-26; Re: Marr and another (bankrupts) case (1990) 2 All ER 880 and Contempt Proceedings Against Chief Secretary Sindh 2013 SCMR 1752 rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 212 199---Rules relating to terms and conditions of service---Constitutional jurisdiction…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492