| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1538 2018 SLD 1538 2018 YLR 1455 |
Sindh High Court
Crl. Appeal No. D-10 of 2015, decision & hearing Dated: 08-05-2017.
NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO, JUSTICE, MOHAMMED KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICE
Syed Muhammad Waseem Shah for Appellants. Syed Meeral Shah Bukhari, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
Crl. Appeal No. D-10 of 2015, decision & hearing Dated: 08-05-2017.
NAIMATULLAH PHULPOTO, JUSTICE, MOHAMMED KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICE
Syed Muhammad Waseem Shah for Appellants. Syed Meeral Shah Bukhari, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.
NAZAR MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER
VS
THE STATE
Law:
Section:
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 310-A & 201---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Ss. 6 & 7---Qatl-i-amd, giving a female in marriage or otherwise in badl-e-sulah, causing disappearance of evidence of offence, or giving false information to screen offender, act of terrorism---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Prosecution case was that the daughter of complainant left his house with her paramour who returned his daughter after few days---Accused/appellants, who were uncle and cousin of the complainant thereafter took the daughter of complainant to their house for some time in order to avoid further disgrace---Complainant and his wife used to visit his daughter from time to time, at the house of accused-appellants but on one such visit, she was not present in the house---Accused-appellants had informed the complainant who had reached there with two witnesses, that she did not want to remain there and wanted to go out of their house---Daughter of complainant was murdered by accused and buried in the ditch to preserve the family honour---Record showed that complainant and his two relatives were the key prosecution witnesses---Said witnesses in the FIR and in their statements recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. had stated that accused-appellants had murdered the deceased but resiled before the Trial Court and refused to support the prosecution case---Said witnesses stated that accused-appellants had told them that deceased had left their house, they and other relatives searched for her and came to know that her dead body was buried near the graveyard---Witnesses denied that they had changed their evidence due to compromise, threat, inducement or for any other reason---Dead body was exhumed which was identified by the complainant as his daughter---Said witnesses were declared to be hostile---Names of the accused-appellants had been added by the police---Circumstances established that prosecution failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt---Accused-appellants were acquitted by setting aside conviction and sentence recorded by the Trial Court. Muhammad Sarfraz v. State 2013 SCMR (sic); Aurengzeb v. State 1990 SCMR…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492