| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 148 2018 SLD 148 2018 PLD 151 |
Lahore High Court
Cr. Misc. No. 61180 of 2017, hearing Date : 24-08-2017
HABIB ULLAH AMIR, JUSTICE
Muhammad Usman Anwar Ch. And Ch. Iftikhar Ahmad for Petitioners. Asif Javed Qureshi for
Respondent No.3. Ali Hassan, D.P.P. with M. Riaz ASI for the State.
Cr. Misc. No. 61180 of 2017, hearing Date : 24-08-2017
HABIB ULLAH AMIR, JUSTICE
Muhammad Usman Anwar Ch. And Ch. Iftikhar Ahmad for Petitioners. Asif Javed Qureshi for
Respondent No.3. Ali Hassan, D.P.P. with M. Riaz ASI for the State.
MIAN GHULAM IJAZ AND OTHERS
VS
THE STATE AND OTHERS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 167
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 167---Remand of accused---Object---Remand of accused to the custody of police for investigation was not to be granted in a mechanical manner; rather be granted by application of judicial mind---Court was to scrutinize acts of police and ensure that there was some evidence collected by police against the accused---Detention of a person without any legal justification would create a sense of injustice and insecurity in the society. Rashid v. The State and 2 others PLD 1970 Lah. 389; Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad Ehtesab Bureau through Chairman v. Khalil Ahmed Abbasi PLD 2002 Azad J&K 20; Bashir Ahmed v. The State and 5 others PLD 2012 Lah. 260; Muhammad Siddiq v. Province of Sindh through Home Secretary, Karachi and 2 others PLD 1992 Kar. 358; Adeel and another v. The State 2016 YLR 2212; Haseeba Taimor Afridi v. The State and another 2013 SCMR 1326; Mst. Allah Rakhi v. Senior Superintendent of Police Faisalabad and 3 others 2000 PCr.LJ 1576 and Riaz ul Haq and another v. Muhammad Naveed and another 2005 YLR 805) rel. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 167---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 34 & 109---Qatl-i-amd, common intention, abetment---Remand of accused to police custody---Scope---Petitioners were charged for hatching conspiracy and abetting unidentified accused---Investigating Officer urged for physical remand of the accused-petitioners on the ground that unidentified accused person were to be arrested---Judicial Magistrate turned down the request of the Investigating Officer for further physical remand---Appellant Court while accepting the revision petition allowed the Investigating Officer to get physical remand of the accused person---Validity---Request was made by the Investigating Officer for further physical remand despite the fact that physical remand for nine days was previously given by the Judicial Magistrate---Investigating Officer had requested that investigation was to be finalized in presence of accused and that he intended to arrest unidentified accused persons as petitioners had promised their arrest---Petitioners remained on physical remand with police but…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492