Case Details

Citation(s)
2019 SLG 2714 2019 SLD 2714 2019 PLJ 151
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 2175 of 2017, decision & hearing Dated: 09.05.2018.
MUJAHID MUSTAQEEM AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Mr. Muhammad Saleem Faiz, Advocate
Respondent(s) by: Mr. Aftab Ahmad Goraya, Advocate

MUHAMMAD NASAR ULLAH

VS

SPECIAL JUDGE RENT TRIBUNAL CHISHTIAN, DISTRICT BAHAWALNAGAR AND 4 OTHERS

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

Law: Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009

Section: 12(3)

Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 199--Punjab Rent Premises Act, 2009, S. 12(3)--Constitutional Jurisdiction--Petitioner being tenant filed petition for fulfilling obligation of tenancy agreement--Landlords also filed ejectment petition--Application filed by petitioner for summoning Bank Manager etc. alongwith record--Dismissed--Interlocutory order--Challenge to--Legislature has not provided remedy of appeal, revision or review against an interlocutory order under relevant laws just to curtail off shoot of litigation--Admittedly, instant writ petition has been filed against interim order passed by learned Rent Tribunal and as such same is not amenable in constitutional jurisdiction of this Court--After decision of ejectment petition, it will be open for petitioner to assail any final order as well as interim order before appellate Court, in accordance with law-Petition was dismissed. 1996 SCMR 1165, 1999 SCMR 1447, 2010 CLC 1590 & PLD 2016 Lahore 73, ref. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUJAHID MUSTAQEEM AHMED, JUSTICE---.--- By filing instant writ petition in terms of Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the petitioner has assailed the legality and propriety of order dated 20.02.2017 passed by learned Rent Tribunal, whereby the application for summoning of Bank Manager as witness alongwith bank record and bank statement and record keeper of excise and taxation department alongwith record, filed by the petitioner stood dismissed, mainly on the grounds of against facts, law and as such the same is not sustainable. 2. The background of this petition and necessary for its fair adjudication is that on 12.01.2016 the petitioner, being tenant, filed a petition under Section12(3) of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 against the Respondents No. 2 to 5 (respondents) for fulfilling the obligation of tenancy agreement dated 03.03.2015 and subsequently on 19.02.2016 the respondents (landlords) also filed ejectment petition against the present petitioner (tenant) and the said petitions were contested by both the parties. Out of divergent pleadings of the parties, the learned Rent Tribunal framed consolidated issues on 08.06.2016.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492