Case Details

Citation(s)
2016 SLG 1795 2016 SLD 1795 2016 SCP 205
Supreme Court of Pakistan
CIVIL APPEAL No. 1033 OF 2014, 06.04.2016
MR., JUSTICE EJAZ AFZAL KHAN, MR., JUSTICE SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD AND MR., JUSTICE FAISAL ARAB, JJ

Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395

Muhammad Arif Muhammad Hassani

VS

Amanullah And Others

Law:

Section:

Keywords: Result: FAISAL ARAB, J.- In the General Elections that were held on 11.5.2013, the appellant and respondent No. 1 were the main contesting candidates from Balochistan Provincial Assembly seat PB-39 Chagai-I. For 66842 registered voters of this constituency, the Election Commission setup 73 polling stations. In all 35197 valid votes were polled. The turnout was 55%. The appellant bagged 12289 votes and the respondent No. 1 bagged 13376 votes. The rest went to other candidates. Leading with a margin of 1087 votes, the respondent No. 1 was declared returned candidate. The appellant was not satisfied with the result. He alleged rigging on the part of respondent No. 1 and filed an election petition before the Election Tribunal, Quetta. The challenge was mainly based on the grounds that (i) the respondent No. 1 employed corrupt and illegal practices in 25 polling stations and did not allow his polling agents to enter their respective polling stations; (ii) the Returning Officer had changed locations of certain polling stations without seeking prior permission from the Election Commission and without notice to the contesting candidates due to which voters of such polling stations could not cast their votes; and (iii) the Returning Officer, in connivance with respondent No. 1 made changes in the polling staff after appointment of the Presiding Officer and other polling staff without intimation to the Election Commission. 2. During the pendency of the election petition, the appellant filed an application before the Election Tribunal seeking verification of thumb impressions on the counterfoils of the votes polled in 25 disputed polling stations through biometric system of NADRA, which was granted. Record reflects that the election material was dispatched to NADRA for verification. As per NADRA's report out of 25 polling stations, it did not receive election material of two polling stations i.e. Polling Station Nos. 64 and 73. The Election Tribunal after recording evidence of the parties dismissed the election petition. Aggrieved by such decision, the appellant filed the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Kamran Murtaza straightaway took…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492