| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 1106 2018 SLD 1106 2018 YLR 560 |
Suit No. 677 of 2015, decision Dated: 08-02-2017, hearing Dates: 20th October, 2nd, 16th and 29th November, 2016.
Khawaja Shamsul Islam for Plaintiffs. Salahuddin Ahmed for Defendant No. 3. Arshad Tayeably and Shahzad Ashraf for Defendant No. 4. Ms. Kalpana Devi, A.A.G. for Defendant No. 1.
KATHIAWAR COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. THROUGH MEMBER MANAGING COMMITTEE AND ANOTHER
VS
PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42,54
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 1,2
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXXIX, Rr. 1 & 2---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction---Cooperative Housing Society---Allotment of amenity plot for establishment of a girls high school---Terms and conditions of allotment---Subsequent lease of said plot---Applicability of conditions of allotment to the said lease---Temporary injunction, grant of---Plot in question was allotted and not sold or auctioned to the defendants---Said allotment was on cost to cost basis and only development charges were recovered---Allotment of plot in question was made for the betterment of area residents including establishment of a girls high school---Parties could not be allowed to change the conditions and understand-ing executed between them---Conditions attached to allotment were tool for safeguarding the interest and well-being of the residents of Housing Society---Purpose of incorporating conditions in allotment was to enable the Housing Society to take appropriate actions in accordance with law for any breach of such conditions if committed---If allotment had some restrictions then subsequent lease deed could not be read in isolation viz-a-viz the allotment---Allotment conditions were in conformity with the main agreement as well as sub-lease---Said conditions could neither be ignored nor it could be said that same were not applicable to the subsequent lease---Plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience was in their favour---Plaintiffs would suffer irreparable loss if injunctive relief was refused---Application for grant of temporary injunction was allowed in circumstances. Subedar Manzoor Hussain (deceased) Through LRs. v. Mst. Mehmooda Begum (deceased) through LRs., PLJ 2004 SC 439; Morris Tanvir v. Federation of Pakistan through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Islamabad and 2 others 2009 CLC 1199; Province of Sindh through Chief Secretary and 8 others v. Syed Kabir Bokhari 2016 SCMR 101 and American International School System v. Mian Muhammad Ramzan and others 2015 SCMR 1449 rel. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD JUNAID GHAFFAR, JUSTICE:---.--- This is a Suit for Declaration,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492