Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 788 2017 SLD 788 2017 PLC 1478

Civil Revision No. 74 of 2015, decision dated: 16-03-2017.
WAZIR SHAKEEL AHMED, JUSTICE
Petitioner(s) by: Johar Ali
Respondent(s) by: Manzoor Ahmed

WAZIR SHAKEEL AHMED, JUSTICE CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL AND 2 OTHERS

VS

IRSHAD ALI AND 9 OTHERS

Law:

Section:

Civil service--- ----Pension---Employee was not granted pension benefits on the ground that he had not completed minimum required ten years service as permanent employee in the department---Validity---Two other incumbents who were colleagues of the employee were getting the pensionary benefits---Case of other two employees was same and identical in all respects---Findings of courts below were based on facts of the present case as well as that of the previous suits of the same nature---Revision was dismissed in circumstances. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: WAZIR SHAKEEL AHMED, J.--- Heard. Record also perused. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the present respondents filed a civil suit against the petitioners and respondents Nos.8 to 10 before the court of competent jurisdiction on 12-10-2013 stating that their father namely Shah Nawaz s/o Shah Murad was initially appointed as work charge Mali in Pak PWD in the year 1953 at that time the maintenance of the Gilgit Airport was the responsibility of Pak PWD Department. In the year 1965 the services of the father of plaintiffs/respondents Nos.1 to 7 along with other government servants were shifted to Airport Development Agency (ADA) who performed their duties under Airport Development Authority Gilgit getting the pay from the above department till 1972 when the father of answering respondents along with other government servants were regularized as permanent servants vide letter No ADM-11/WC-3/70/7376 dated 16-8-1972. In the year 1986 in the result of an agreement the maintenance staff of Airport Development Authority Gilgit were absorbed in Civil Aviation Authority in the light of which the absorbed Airport Development Authority personal were held entitled for all benefits as that of the personals of Civil Aviation Authority but to utmost disappointment of the father of the present respondents Nos.1 to 7, the present petitioner denied pension benefits to him with the plea that he was not completed minimum required 10 years service as permanent employee in Civil Aviation Authority. 3. It painful to observe that the father of respondents Nos.1 to 7 has gone to his account during the struggle of his…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492