Law: Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)

Section: 2(g),15,15(2)(vii)

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: O.XXII,R.4

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 25(2),199

Law: Succession Act, 1925

Section: 305

(a) Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance (XVII of 1979)--- ----Ss. 15 & 2(g)---Succession Act (XXXIX of 1925), S. 305---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XXII, R.4---Ejectment of tenant---Personal bona fide need of landlord---Death of landlord---Effect---Contention of tenant was that landlord had died and right to sue did not survive to the legal heirs of the landlord who were females only---Eviction petition was dismissed by the Rent Controller but same was allowed by the Appellant Court---Validly---Sections 2(g) & 15(2)(vii) of Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 had treated the landlord and his spouse or his son or daughter as 'one unit'---No requirement existed to breakdown the solidarity and integrity of the family unit and to consider the individual needs of the landlord's wife, sons or daughters---Tenant could be evicted for the requirement of landlord for bona fide use of himself and other members of his family---Right to sue did survive to the member of the family of deceased landlord---Members of landlord's family would take his/her place and they would be competent to continue the suit for eviction initiated by the landlord for his occupation and for occupation of surviving members of his family---Law did not discriminate a female family members from the male family members and vice versa---Right of enjoyment of tenanted property on the ground of bona fide use did not die with the death of landlord---Legal heirs could urge all the contentions which the deceased could have urged except only those which were personal to the deceased---Relief under Art. 199 of the Constitution was discretionary and unless impugned had resulted in injustice or irreparable loss or injury there was no justification for interference---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. M. Siddique Butt v. ADJ, Lahore 2010 CLC 1095; Ahmed Saeed Rizvi v. Janat Bibi 2006 CLC 1848; Husna Begum v. Deen Mohammad 1999 CLC 1399 and Rajagopala v. P. Revanna 1974(1) KLJ 425.K. rel. (b) Constitution of Pakistan-- ----Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Scope---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court could only be exercised if impugned order was based on…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492