Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 1494 2017 SLD 1494 2017 PLC 1283
Peshawar High Court
Writ Petition No. 931-P of 2015, decision Dated: 8th October, 2015. Heard on: 8th October, 2015.
QAISAR RASHID KHAN, JUSTICE, AMANULLAH KHAN KAINI, JUSTICE
Fawad Saleh for Petitioner. Ikhtiar Khan Incharge NJPIC and Imranullah, Assistant Legal Draftsman for
Respondent No.1.

KIRAN AYUB TANOLI, ADVOCATE

VS

REGISTRAR PESHAWAR HIGH COURT PESHAWAR AND ANOTHER

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

(a) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Judicial Service Rules, 2001 ---.--- ---.--- -R. 7(b) ---.--- Constitution of Pakistan, Art.199(5) ---.--- Constitutional petition ---.--- Maintainability ---.--- Advertisement for appointment of Additional District and Sessions Judges ---.--- Condition of five vakalatnamas per year for the last five years ---.--- Scope ---.--- "Practicing advocate" ---.--- Scope ---.--- High Court advertised posts of Additional District and Sessions Judges for which condition of five vakalatnamas per year for the last five years was added ---.--- Contention of petitioner was that said condition of five vakalatnamas per year for the last five years was against Fundamental Right ---.--- Validity ---.--- Petitioner had not brought on record even copy of a single vakalatnama to prove that she remained a practicing advocate during the last five years ---.--- Petitioner had even failed to produce any joint vakalatnama or any list of cases conducted by her jointly ---.--- Lawyers community of the entire Province had not only hailed the said condition but had also deemed it to be in the interest of lawyers and in turn the judiciary ---.--- Said condition of five vakalatnamas per year for the last five years was not in violation of Fundamental Rights of the petitioner ---.--- Said condition would minimize the concept of non-practicing advocates or absenteeism from the legal profession ---.--- Department had right to enhance qualification and standard for recruitment and promotion in order to maintain efficiency in service ---.--- Non-judicial or administrative orders of High Court had been protected under Art.199(5) of the Constitution ---.--- Constitutional petition was dismissed in limine. Muhammad Nadeem Arif and others v. Inspector General of Police Punjab, Lahore and others 2010 PLC (C.S.) 924; Tahmasub Faraz Tayyab and 13 others v. Vice-Chancellor, University of Health Sciences, Lahore and 3 others PLD 2005 Lah. 261; Lt. Col. Nafis-ud-Din Ansari v. Qazi Habibullah and others PLD 1989 Lah. 26; M. Adil Hayat Khan v. Government of Sindh and others PLD 2002 Kar. 131; Abdul Aziz and another v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa through Chief Secretary and 3 others…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492