| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 2528 2018 SLD 2528 2018 PTD 2500 |
Customs Appellate Tribunal
Customs Appeal No. K-1430 of 2017, decision Dated: 12-04-2018, hearing Date : 06-02-2018
MUHAMMAD NADEEM QURESHI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) MUHAMMAD NAZIM SALEEM, MEMBER (TECHNICAL-II)
Nadeem Mirza, Consultant for Appellant. Umer Baloch, V.O. for
Respondent No. 2. Ashfaq Ahmed, P.A. for
Respondent No.3.
Customs Appeal No. K-1430 of 2017, decision Dated: 12-04-2018, hearing Date : 06-02-2018
MUHAMMAD NADEEM QURESHI, MEMBER (JUDICIAL-I) MUHAMMAD NAZIM SALEEM, MEMBER (TECHNICAL-II)
Nadeem Mirza, Consultant for Appellant. Umer Baloch, V.O. for
Respondent No. 2. Ashfaq Ahmed, P.A. for
Respondent No.3.
MESSRS NICE TRADERS, GUJRANWALA
VS
THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF VALUATION, CUSTOMS HOUSE, KARACHI AND 2 OTHERS
Law: Customs Act, 1969
Section: 25,25A,25D,80,81,194A
Law: Customs Rules, 2001
Section: R.438
Customs Act (IV of 1969)- -Ss.25, 25-A, 25-D, 80, 81 & 194-A-Customs Rules, 2001, R.438- Determination of customs value of goods-Declared value of imported goods was accepted by the Clearance Collectorate-Director, Directorate General of valuation issued Valuation Ruing against which revision application was filed before Director General, Directorate General of Valuation, who, remanded the matter to director for conducting fresh exercise for issuance of ruling; while doing so Director General failed to set aside the ruling in question issued by Director and same remained in field for the purpose of assessment- Importer's Clearing Agent approached Chief Collector for clearance of consignment under S.81 of the Customs Act, 1969 which he refused on the basis of Chief Collector's Circular dated 22-11-2017-No cross- objections, under subsection (4) of S.194-A of the Customs Act, 1969 were filed within the stipulated period of 30 days, by the department but were filed on the date of hearing-Departmental Representative stated that order passed by Director General of Valuation was correct in fact and law-Under the provisions of S.25-D of the Customs Act, 1969, the Director General Valuation had no power to re-determine the value of the imported goods under scrutiny before him-Concept of remand was not available under the provisions of S.25-D of the Customs Act, 1969- Director General of valuation was not empowered to remand a ruling without setting aside the same-Order of remand in violation of the provision of law could not be passed without setting aside the Valuation Ruling-When a ruling was remanded, same was deemed to be set aside and as such non-existent for any purpose, including passing the assessment order under provisions of S.80 of the Customs Act, 1969 and R.438 of Customs Rules, 2001-Director General of Valuation by doing so, in fact rendered the Valuation Ruling ab initio void, being in derogation of S.25 of the Customs Act, 1969-Impugned Valuation Ruling, was not in existence and could not be applied on the consignment of the importer from the date of its issuance--Director General of valuation, in revision had not disputed the veracity of the import…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492