| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 2337 2018 SLD 2337 2018 PLJ 307 |
C.P. No. 2023-L of 2016, decision & hearing Dated: 11.10.2017. (Against judgment Dated 26.1.2016 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore passed in Writ Petition No. 13263 of 2010).
GULZAR AHMED, JUSTICE MAQBOOL BAQAR, JUSTICE MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, JUSTICE
Ms. Asma Hamid, Addl. AG Pb. and Rao M. Yousaf Khan, AOR (Absent) for Petitioners. Mr. Taffazul Haider Rizvi, ASC and Ms. Tasneem, Akhter, AOR (Absent) for
Respondent No. 1. Not reprsented for
Respondent No. 2.
SECRETARY, HOUSING & PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND PHE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
VS
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN AND OTHERS
Law:
Section:
Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Art. 185(2) & (3)--Allotment of plot--Land Disposal Rules 2002--Disposal of land by development authorities (Regulations) Rules 2002--Government launching scheme of rehabilitation--Merger of land implementation of order of allotment in favor of respondent--Application for allotment filed by respondent--Dismissed--Respondent applied in new housing scheme launched by Government--Additional Commissioner accepted respondent's application--Implementation of--High Court accepted writ petition--Challenge to--Petitioner contended that Respondent No 1 has no right or interest in the subject land as the same has never been converted or demarcated or numbered as a plot, thus not made part of any housing scheme--Further contended that plots measuring 5 Marlas are to be disposed of through auction only-Validity--The Subject land/plot is situated in a low income housing scheme, Respondent No 2 who was employee of petitioner department was allotted a plot, taking undue advantage of his position and in connivance of his colleagues, he purportedly got the subject land/plot merged into his plot illegally--Merger was affected despite the pendency of Respondent No l's application for allotment of the subject land/plot--Allotment in favor of Respondent No 1 has throughout been upheld by the various judicial forums, and ultimately by Supreme Court has not been able to cite any law, rule, policy, pertaining to the period and/or scheme, disentitling Respondent No 1 from allotment/transfer of subject plot--Respondent No 1 was directed to pay the prevailing market price of the land/plot for its allotment and transfer in his favour--Disposed of. Interpretation of Statutes-- ----Land Disposal Rules 2002--Disposal of land by development authorities (Regulations) Rules 2002--Retrospective effects--It is cardinal principle of law that in the absence of a stipulation to the contrary, any change in law effecting substantial right have prospective application only. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MAQBOOL BAQAR, J.- The petitioner, through the above petition, has sought leave to appeal against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, whereby…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492