| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2018 SLG 665 2018 SLD 665 2018 PLD 15 |
High Court (AJ&K)
Writ Petition No. 102 of 2011, decision Date : 13-10-2017.
MOHAMMAD SHERAZ KAYANI, JUSTICE
Raja Khalid Mehmood and Raja Hassan Akhtar for Petitioners. Syed Nishat Kazmi, Ch. Muhammad Riaz Aalam and Ch. Tehseen Ahmed for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 102 of 2011, decision Date : 13-10-2017.
MOHAMMAD SHERAZ KAYANI, JUSTICE
Raja Khalid Mehmood and Raja Hassan Akhtar for Petitioners. Syed Nishat Kazmi, Ch. Muhammad Riaz Aalam and Ch. Tehseen Ahmed for
Respondents.
KHALID MEHMOOD KHAN AND 13 OTHERS
VS
BOARD OF REVENUE, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR MUZAFFARABAD AND 21 OTHERS
Law: Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reforms Act, 1960
Section: 25,25A
Law: Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section: 39
(a) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reforms Act (IV of 1960)--- ----S. 25---'Co-sharers' in Shamilat-e-deh---Scope---New occupancy tenants who had acquired the rights of ownership under the Land Reforms Act, 1960---Entitlement---Only the old owners were entitled in the old Shamilat-e-deh land according to their proportionate shares in the holding---New owners, who acquired the proprietary rights under the Land Reforms Act, 1960 were not co-sharers in the old Shamilat-e-deh land, however, any person who had purchased a land from an old owner with share of Shamilat-e-deh land, definitely would be entitled for the Shamilat-e-deh land according to his proportionate share of the purchased land. (b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Land Reforms Act (IV of 1960)--- ----S. 25-A since declared repugnant to Injunctions of Islam---'Co-sharers' in Shamilat-e-deh---After S. 25-A of the Land Reforms Act, 1960 was declared repugnant to Injunctions of Islam, new owners, who acquired proprietary rights under the Land Reforms Act, 1960 were held to be not co-sharers in the old Shamilat-e-deh land---High Court (AJ&K) declared that when S. 25-A of the Land Reforms Act, 1960 was no more a part of the statute book, then any entry made in pursuance of that law in the revenue record shall be deemed to be null and void---Writ petition was allowed accordingly. Said Akbar and 11 others v. Muhammad Shakoor and 2 others 2017 SCR 108 and Azad Government through Advocate General v. Raja Waleed Khan Civil Appeal No. 30/1991, decision date: 12.11.1992 ref. (c) Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967)--- ----S. 39---Entries in the revenue record---Scope---Such enteries themselves did not confer any right of ownership, when the same were found contrary to law having no statutory backing. THIS JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY: MOHAMMAD SHERAZ KAYANI, JUSTICE:---.--- Through the above captioned petition filed under section 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act, 1974, following reliefs have been implored by the petitioners:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the writ petition may kindly be accepted and the impugned order be set aside declaring it as void ab initio order, with costs. 2. Any…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492