Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 461 2017 SLD 461 2017 SCMR 309
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Review Petition No. 147 of 2016, decided on 3rd October, 2016, Date of hearing: 3rd October, 2016.
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, QAZI FAEZ ISA, JUSTICE
(For review of the judgment of this Court dated 1.12.2015 in C.P. 247/2011) Sh. Zamir Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and S. Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record (Absent) for Petitioner. Agha Muhammad Ali Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Akhtar

BASHARAT ALI KHAN ER

VS

MUHAMMAD AKBAR --Respondent

Law: Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991

Section: 13(3)

(a) Punjab Pre-emption Act (IX of 1991)--- ----S. 13(3)---Suit for pre-emption---Notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad"---Mandatory requirement---Section 13(3) of the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991 specified unequivocally that "Talb-i-Ishhad" shall be made by written notice, attested by two truthful witnesses, and made under registered cover acknowledgment due---Only situation in which the Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1991, did not require the sending of notice by registered cover acknowledgment due was when the post office facility was not available to a pre-emptor [Proviso to section 13(3)]---Secondly, according to case law, the prescribed condition of service of notice by registered cover acknowledgement due may be relaxed where the defendant/vendee admitted that he had received notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad"--- In all other cases, service of notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad" upon a vendee must be established by the proof of each of the prescribed elements of the notice of such Talb---Prescribed elements of the service of a "Talb-i-Ishhad" notice were specific statutory requirements for the proof of service of notice of such Talb which demand had been construed to be a mandatory obligation of a pre-emptor---Where any of the elements of the prescribed mode of service of "Talb-i-Ishhad" was not proven by a pre-emptor, he dishonoured his mandatory obligation and consequently, his pre-emption suit must fail. (b) Punjab Pre-emption Act (IX of 1991)--- ----S. 13(3)---Suit for pre-emption---Notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad"---Pre-emptor had failed to aver in his plaint that notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad" under registered cover was sent along with an acknowledgment due request, therefore, unless permitted by the Trial Court, pre-emptor could not have produced any evidence on the point of notice under registered cover posted with acknowledgment due---Acknowledgment due card was not produced on record by the pre-emptor nor was the postman, who may have delivered the notice, called to the witness box---According to the pleadings and also the evidence on record, the pre-emptor had not discharged his burden to prove the service of notice of "Talb-i-Ishhad" as required under S. 13(3) of the Punjab Pre-emption Act,…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492