Law:

Section:

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 420, 468 & 471---Cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property, forgery for purpose of cheating, using as genuine a forged document---Bail, grant of---Bail granted on basis of undertaking given by counsel of accused---Allegation against the accused was that he, in collusion with his co-accused, prepared a forged Iqrarnama to usurp the agricultural land owned by the complainant and defrauded him---Accused categorically stated that he was not involved in preparing the forged document (Iqrarnama), nor he had anything to do with the same---Counsel for accused undertook at the Bar that if the accused was admitted to bail, he shall not claim any benefit on the basis of the impugned document, nor will he use it anywhere---Complainant had no objection if bail was granted to the accused, provided that he stood by the undertaking---Offence alleged did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S. 497, Cr.P.C.---Accused was admitted to bail in circumstances with the observation that the complainant shall be at liberty to file a petition for cancellation of bail granted to the accused, if the latter, in any manner, tried to flout the undertaking given by his counsel. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MANZOOR AHMAD MALIK, JUSTICE:---------- Petitioner seeks bail after arrest in case FIR No. 545 of 2015, dated 21.08.2015, offence under sections 420, 468, 471, P.P.C., registered at P.S. B-Division Kasur. 2. Precise allegation against the petitioner, as per the FIR, is that he in collusion with his co-accused, prepared a forged Iqrarnama to usurp the agricultural land owned by the complainant and defrauded him. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant,…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492