Case Details

Citation(s)
2017 SLG 1945 2017 SLD 1945 2017 CLC 561
Lahore High Court
Intra Court Appeal No. 1155 of 2016, decision Date : 02-02-2017
AYESHA A. MALIK, JUSTICE, JAWAD HASSAN, JUSTICE
Amir Mahmood for Appellants. Waqar A. Sheikh and Mian Aman Ullah Khan for
Respondents.

NABEEL AKHTAR CHAUDHRY & OTHERS

VS

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 5 OTHERS

Law: Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972

Section: 3

Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)--- ----S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Intra Court appeal---Constitutional petition---Appellant impugned order whereby appellant's Constitutional petition was disposed of, with direction to the competent authority to consider and decide application of appellant within a period of eight weeks---Contention of appellant, inter alia, was that impugned order was passed summarily without considering legal and factual points of the matter---Validity---Perusal of impugned order revealed that direction to decide application of appellant / petitioner within a period of eight weeks was passed in accordance with law and appellant had been granted an opportunity of hearing as well---No reason existed to interfere in the impugned order---Intra-court appeal was dismissed, in circumstances. THIS JUDGMENT PASSED BY: JAWAD HASSAN, JUSTICE:---.--- Through this appeal, the Appellants/ Petitioners have called in question the order dated 09.06.2016 rendered in W.P. No.20044/2016 passed by the learned Single Judge (the "Impugned Order"), whereby the Constitutional Petition of the Appellants /Petitioners was disposed of with direction to the Respondent No.6 to decide application of the Petitioner (Annexure-I), pending before him, if any within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. Further the office is directed to transmit a copy of this order along with all annexures to Director General, LDA, Lahore (Respondent No.1) who shall look into the grievance of the Petitioner regarding non-development of West Wood Society, situated at Thokar Niaz Baig, Lahore by respondents Nos.3 and 4 who shall decide the matter by himself or by someone else, competent in the matter within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order after hearing all the stake-holders including the present Petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellants submitted that the learned Single Judge has summarily disposed of the writ petition without considering the factual as well as legal points raised by the Appellants, as such the same is liable to be set aside; that the learned Single Judge has failed to take into account the fact that…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492