| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2017 SLG 2419 2017 SLD 2419 2017 YLR 1622 |
Peshawar High Court
F.A.O. No. 03-P with C.M. No. 06 of 2016, decision & hearing Dated: 23-1-2017.
IKRAMULLAH KHAN, JUSTICE
Syed Muhammad Ilyas for Appellants. Muhammad Sami-ur-Rehman for
Respondent.
F.A.O. No. 03-P with C.M. No. 06 of 2016, decision & hearing Dated: 23-1-2017.
IKRAMULLAH KHAN, JUSTICE
Syed Muhammad Ilyas for Appellants. Muhammad Sami-ur-Rehman for
Respondent.
LUTFULLAH AND ANOTHER
VS
SHAHID INAYAT
Law:
Section:
(a) Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963)--- ----Ss. 17 & 27---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XVII, R. 3---Eviction of tenant---Wilful default---Non-issuance of show-cause notice to tenant---Non-holding of inquiry--- Scope--- Tenant/petitioner contended that eviction order was illegally passed against him in the wake of his failure to submit written reply---Landlord contended that right of defence of tenant was correctly struck off by Rent Controller---Validity---Record revealed that on account of default in submission of written reply on behalf of tenant, Rent Controller had not only struck off defence of tenant but also ordered eviction of the tenant---Section 17 of Cantonments Rent Restriction Act, 1963 prescribed a special procedure to be adopted by the Rent Controller before passing any final order in regard to eviction of a tenant or otherwise---In the present case, no show-cause notice either after filing the application of eviction or thereafter, when the defence was struck off was served upon the tenant---Ordinary summons could not be a substitute for show-cause notice---Whole proceedings would be void ab initio without show-cause notice--Under S. 27 of Cantonments Rent Restriction Act 1963, power of the Rent Controller was curtailed to pass order of eviction under S. 17 of the Act, except after holding an inquiry and the inquiry did not mean to consider the allegation put forth by a party in his pleadings but the court would give an opportunity to both the parties to substantiate the facts alleged in their respective pleadings through proper evidence---No doubt, Rent Controller had been conferred with powers, in term of subsection 2(b) of S.27 to compel the discovery and production of any document and other material evidence , while subsection (2) of S.27 provided that for the purposes of holding an inquiry under the Act, Rent Controller and appellate court would have same powers as were vested in a court under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for summoning and forcing of any person and examining him on oath; compelling the discovery and production of any document and other material evidence; and issuing a commission for the examination…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492