| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2017 SLG 1957 2017 SLD 1957 2017 CLC 694 |
Sindh High Court
Constitution Petition No. D-846 of 2014, decision & hearing Date : 26-04-2016
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE
David Lawrence for Plaintiffs. Shahryar Imdad Awan, Assistant Advocate General Sindh and Shafique Ahmed Leghari State Counsel representing Official
Respondents. Aftab Ahmed Shar for
Respondent No.11.
Constitution Petition No. D-846 of 2014, decision & hearing Date : 26-04-2016
AQEEL AHMED ABBASI, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE
David Lawrence for Plaintiffs. Shahryar Imdad Awan, Assistant Advocate General Sindh and Shafique Ahmed Leghari State Counsel representing Official
Respondents. Aftab Ahmed Shar for
Respondent No.11.
ABDUL HUQ & ANOTHER
VS
THE PROVINCE OF SINDH & 10 OTHERS
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 4,199
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Suit for declaration and injunction---Claim of the petitioners about property was disputed by the respondents and Revenue Authorities---Questions of title of property and possession thereof could not be decided without recording of evidence---Such exercise could not be undertaken by High Court under its constitutional jurisdiction---Constitutional petition was dismissed in circumstances. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Adequate and efficacious remedy available---Claim of the petitioners about property was disputed by the respondents and Revenue Authorities---Revenue authorities had also filed suo motu reference before the concerned authority for cancellation of entries in revenue record about the ownership of petitioners---If such entries were ordered to be cancelled, same could be challenged under the relevant revenue laws---Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court could not be invoked where adequate and efficacious remedy had been provided under law---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. Federation of Pakistan and others v. Major (Retd.) Muhammad Sabir Khan PLD 1991 SC 476 rel. (c) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Arts. 4 & 199---Constitutional petition---Claim of petitioner was disputed by respondents and Revenue Authorities---Due process of law---Applicability---Due process of law was of wide import and its applicability varied from case to case in accordance with the set of facts and circumstances---Due process of law was also directly related to the rights, interest and entitlement of a person as recognized by law---Petitioners could not make out a prime facie case of their legal entitlement of possession of suit property---Entries in the revenue record about their alleged claim were under scrutiny before the concerned authorities---Term "due process of law" was not applicable in circumstances---Constitutional petition was dismissed accordingly. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: MUHAMMAD FAISAL KAMAL ALAM, JUSTICE:---.--- Through instant petition, the Petitioners…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492